LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

Narendra Pal shared a profile on Facebook
10 hours ago
Profile IconLIS Links now has birthdays
13 hours ago
Dr. U. Pramanathan posted blog posts
13 hours ago
Dr. U. Pramanathan posted events
13 hours ago
Dr. U. Pramanathan updated their profile
yesterday
Urvashi kaushik replied to Sunil K Upneja's discussion Clarification regarding CAS promotion of College Librarian
yesterday
S. Jaffer Basha left a comment for Dr Jolly Varghese U
Tuesday
Dr. U. Pramanathan posted blog posts
Tuesday
Dr. U. Pramanathan posted events
Tuesday
ASHOKKUMAR SINGH commented on Dr. U. Pramanathan's blog post Recruitment of Librarian Gr.II/Librarian Senior, Assistant Librarian, Library Restorer & Documentist @ Baba Farid University of Health Sciences (BFUHS), Faridkot, Punjab.
Tuesday
ASHOKKUMAR SINGH commented on Dr. U. Pramanathan's blog post Recruitment of Librarian Gr.II/Librarian Senior, Assistant Librarian, Library Restorer & Documentist @ Baba Farid University of Health Sciences (BFUHS), Faridkot, Punjab.
Tuesday
Sanraj Roy posted an event
Thumbnail

Advanced Training programme on Bibliometrics and Research Output Analysis at Library Network Centre, Infocity, Gandhinagar382007, Gujarat, India.

December 2, 2024 to December 6, 2024
Monday
SHWETHA KV posted a discussion
Monday
Sunil K Upneja posted a discussion
Monday
Dr. Mahabaleshwara Rao Baikady posted an event

6th NACML (National Conference on Management of Modern Libraries) - 2025 at Dr. TMA Pai Hall

February 21, 2025 at 8am to February 22, 2025 at 5pm
Monday
Saanvi Singh posted a status
"School Librarian Vacancy for 125 Post in Tripura: https://shorturl.at/GEgWl"
Saturday
Urvashi kaushik and Vikram Jain are now friends
Saturday
Urvashi kaushik replied to Mrs. Vishakha R. Rajguru's discussion Evidence for CBSE Librarians Status in Maharashtra or Maharashtra govt.
Saturday
Urvashi kaushik replied to Mrs. Vishakha R. Rajguru's discussion Evidence for CBSE Librarians Status in Maharashtra or Maharashtra govt.
Saturday
Profile IconRenuka M Yalamali, SAMEER SAI PAINKRA, Annanya and 6 more joined LIS Links
Nov 15

From

            Sunny Joseph, Oxygen Gardens,

            Block-C, Puranattukara P.O

            Thrissur, Kerala-680 551

To

            Hon. Chairman &  Members

            University Grants Commission.

            New Delhi.

Sir,

            Sub : NET June 2012- Tactics of failed & Suggestions for improvement-reg

                        From media reports it is understood that there are lot of complaints against the cut-off marks fixed for UGC NET June 2012 examination, that  is “altering” the notified criteria for pass.

In the outset I have to mention that this charge is raised by failed candidates, some media people and some politicians who either do not read the notification or do not understand the text or intentionally manipulating the text of the notification as tactics. In whatever case UGC may ignore the Giebelsian lies or the utterances yielding to which will open the Pandora’s box. The aim of an eligibility exam. is not to choose the mediocres  but to select the best. Demand for lowering the cut-off mark is like the demand of those who can not win the 100 m race want to reduce the distance to 90 meters. The unprecedented number of successful  candidates definitely substantiate the criteria decided by UGC.

            I do appreciate UGC for conducting the examination with full transparency this time. Further UGC needs to be highly praised for conducting NET examination for more than two decades with utmost care in all matters. Because of this diligence UGC was never warranted to cancel even one NET examination over these years. But this is not the case of many university examinations or examinations conducted by various Public service Commissions. I salute You, Sir.

             May I suggest few things for improving NET examination.

  1. Reintroduce descriptive examination for Paper III with the provision of model answers or value points to examiners with the right for revaluation  by a panel  and the provision for getting copies of answer papers to candidates when demanded, of course with deterring fee.
  2. Action shall be taken against the unscrupulous evaluators including debarring them from further examinations.
  3. The present criteria of selecting the NET  examiners based on their seniority or academic qualifications or “connections” need to discontinued and UGC should introduce a written test and interview for  assessing the quality of evaluators of NET answer papers periodically and only those who obtain  a minimum of 75% of marks may be included in the panel of examiners. Let their eligibilty certificate may  valid only for 5 years. No caste reservation may be applied at least in this test.

 

  1. As the designation of teachers is changed the test may be renamed as “NET for Asst. Professorship/JRF”

 

The amendments shall definitely improve the selection process of teachers and the reputation of UGC

 

 

Thrissur                                                                                 Yours faithfully,

11-10-2012                                                                         Sunny Joseph.

 

 

 

 

            

Views: 4380

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Sir I salute to you & your highly appreciated succeed 

Sir heartily congratulation !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

as your are a  third ranker in India

I request to All LIS Fresher  as well as NET fighter friends

please try to get knowledge, some tips  from vijaysrinath kanchi sir 

pl. all net candidate friends do concentration on study 

I think some members of our forum try to split this forum on category wise and NET Qualified or NON- NET Qualified so pl do not pay attention like this person or topic 

pl try to get important , knowledgeable things from  lislinks as well as senior professionals  like a vijaysrinath kanchi sir 

 

Thanks & Regards

Digambar B Waghmare 

Thank you very much sir.  In fact, Shri. Vishnu Kumar Gupta from Rajastan who is also our forum member and Shri. Mithun Raj from Goa, another forum member are 1st and 2nd rankers.  They deserve more appreciations.

 

Thank you once again.

 

 

Sir,

I am also against ur opinion...sir. If UGC was not confidant about his objective mode or criteria of cut of mark than no need to conduct this exam. and want to say on thing that is NET means National Eligibility Test  qualifying exam it is not a for give directly Job after passing this exam u need to fight other test or interview also .

R/ Sir 

I agree with your statement, you have put it right. I think UGC should change exam. patter from objective to descriptive.

Regards

Ghante P.B.  

Dear Mr.SUNNY JOSEPH
I can only say that you observe the earlier results carefully, You definitely find that there were different qualifying criteria in different years.

It will be better if you send your valuable suggestions to ugc rather posting it to this site.
I agree some of your suggestions.
My personal opinion is objective mode is ok but there should be negative marks and question pattern should be like civil service preliminary examination.

This year I passed because of only objective mode, because my handwriting is not good and very slow. Earlier years i could,nt attempt all descriptive questions and failed by some marks in paper III only. So,I was confident this year.

Mr Jomy Jose Yes agree with you

also I support  with our all NET affected friends

really from heart  you are doing very good effort for  our NET affected friends

but I think everyone know some of peoples filled case in the court 

as per your information ugc also in coming meeting discuss this issue

so why are we posted this type of discussion here

& waste our valuable  time also disturb our others NET preparing friends

now i think Just wait & Watch,  than decide what to do?..........ok

Thanks & Regards

Digambar B Waghmare 

 

For applying UGC NET? JRF ugc has to change the minimum qualification 55% to 60 % since most of the university are in grading system .

Respected LIS friends,

I have been saw so many reaction given by LIS friend regarding UGC NET exam criteria and Mode of examination therefore kindly requesting you people that stop these kind of reaction and we will ready for any kind method will adopted by UGC. Now onwards prepare for exam fight for our future not for against UGC modes of exam.

Hard work will taken Us to success

thanking you

Shri. Waghmare Sir,

 

Thank you very much sir.  In fact, Shri. Vishnu Kumar Gupta from Rajastan who is also our forum member and Shri. Mithun Raj from Goa, another forum member are 1st and 2nd rankers.  They deserve more appreciations.

 

Thank you once again.

Thank you sir

I proud of Shri. Vishnu Kumar Gupta from Rajastan- 1st ranker of JUNE 2012 NET Exam

Shri. Mithun Raj from Goa- 2nd ranker of JUNE 2012 NET Exam

both are our lislinks forum members

Heartily Congrats Sir!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

fresher as well as NET fighter our lis forum friends

please try to take advantage of this opportunity 

you can take a guidance of them

also you can ask about some tips for net exam preparation 

Thanks & Regards

Digambar B Waghmare (Librarian)

Sinhgad College of Engineering, MS

 

Mr.Digambar Bhaurao Waghmare
why you are always trying to insult Mr. Sadeesh , Mr. Jomy ete. you are always using words like you becmoe PM, Prisident of India like that this is not a good manner i know mr sadeesh personaly he is man of very good qualities and he is working in a very famous and good organisation and also having large number of very good friends.I think Mr. Jomy Jose is man of very good Personality always behaving in very good manner and in matured way. They have there freedom to speak about net results and regarding filing case ete. but you are thinking that you are the only person eligible for pass net.I am sure that Mr. Jomy, Sadeesh will definitely have more marks than you so please dont try to insult others I saw your comments several times so I am reacting in this way you dont have the quality to assess persons like Sadeesh and Jomy so please stop your insulting comments

Dear Mr. Anoop,

I appreciate you very much on your true comments on some person's mentality, who are feeling a Great Intellectuals and degrading the NOT Qualifiers. They are not realizing that after many attempts, they could qualified the UGC-NET, that too on introduction of OBJECTIVE mode in 3rd paper. This is my last response on this POST.

Srinivas G.,

muddu_sreenu@yahoo.co.in

RSS

© 2024   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop