Replies to This Forum

Permalink Reply by Digambar Bhaurao Waghmare on October 11, 2012 at 17:15

ye mad

you can not post your reply properly

you posted 3 same replys

first try to learn how do you post only one reply 

don't show your knowledge capacity on forum 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Abdul Rasheed on October 11, 2012 at 19:42

I strongly agree with all of your opinion and there should be negative marking system tooo like csir

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dr Shivakumar T C on October 11, 2012 at 19:47

Thanks a lot to you sir,  for your valuable suggestions , your given very good information, once again thank you very much.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Digambar Bhaurao Waghmare on October 11, 2012 at 22:16

Mr. Jomy Jose

I would like to say you friend

yes I completed my M.lib. I.Sc. in 2000

than I got job so i could not have try to passed net exam

I just attempted 2 NET exam in 12 years of long period not effort !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

this on is 3rd ...........ok

you can also ask my record to ugc using RTI 

please check my other replay which i gave you 

Thanks 

Digambar B Waghmare (Librarian)

Sinhgad College of Engineering, MS

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Srinivas Garimella on October 12, 2012 at 3:50

Mr. Digamber,

Being a high qualified person and a grate intellectual (as per your thought), you have not to loose your temper and scolding others in worst language. Be cool and act as a dignified person. Remember Earning of Higher scale and certificates not shows ones personality, for that you are an example.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by K S Verma on October 10, 2012 at 23:42

1)There should be a test for all professionals(Academic/Non-teaching) for annual Increment in government services,presently which are in government job(officer cadre) they are gaining after one time effort/setting.

2)Selection method should be only written exam(selection by interview method is not good)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Manmeet Kaur on October 11, 2012 at 0:32

I am totally against to this

Objective pattern is best.............

and it is to be continued.................

because we are preparing through objective type of books

and it will surely harmful for us

thanks

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Digambar Bhaurao Waghmare on October 11, 2012 at 17:03

Madam 

I agree with you also

I request to all our fresher as well as NET fighter 

do not participated into this type of baseless discussions 

you should concentration on your study first 

I also appeal to senior professional, knowledgeable professional 

please try to post something intellectual or  most important Q/A , E- Books. related to NET Exam ,etc 

do not try to spreed rumors or post baseless media and paper news

Thanking you,

Digambar B Waghmare 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by gpslibrarian on October 11, 2012 at 17:05

i think now UGC should not and will not change NET result 2012. and ugc may implement negative marking in all the paper

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Srinivas Garimella on October 11, 2012 at 4:49

Dear Mr. Sunny Joseph,

I agree with your opinion on Standards in conducting NET, mainly the  "Reintroduction of descriptive examination for Paper III" and "the provision for getting copies of answer papers to candidates when demanded".

But, I am not understanding your mean in posting your Valuable letter written to the UGC at this network. To be fame among all the lislinks members or to express your eyesore on the FAILED candidates. Please  don't forget Some miracles happens, the Diamonds redounds from the Earthen. If a teacher with 55% of marks succeeds his duty 101% (ie., fulfills his duty) than a teacher with 99% marks who can not even 50% succeeded. Then whom the Nation prefers? The 55% or 99%? Only the so called talent (99% marks) persons can not build our Nation strong.

I simply say, Writing this Latter to the UGC is Great but, posting it here is very cheap tactic..

Hope you retreat this letter which pained the FAILED ones from this Network.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Digambar Bhaurao Waghmare on October 11, 2012 at 18:11

Sir I agree with you 

but I think this is not for All our lis friends

its action to reaction to first someone knowledgeable person  sent letter to ugc & posted on our forum 

so sir I personally say sorry if pained the FAILED ones from this Network friends 

everyone be aware from those try to split this forum on category wise and Net qualified or NON NET Qualified 

 

Thanks & Regards

Digambar B Waghmare 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by vijaysrinath kanchi on October 11, 2012 at 5:42

I really appreciate your views.  Yes.. as others said, replying to this thread, I have also qualified NET exam (probably as third ranker in India) because the third paper was in Objective mode.   But I am not really happy with my success entirely because I know for certain how important it is to evaluate a candidate on his descriptive ability.  You are selecting candidates who should have ability to think, present logically and meaningfully and express their own ideas on a topic as a learned men.  This is never possible with Objective mode.  It only examines your ability to memorize and recall.  Nothing else. 

Well some of my fiends here might say I say all this because I have cleared the NET in objective mode and so do not bother about others.  To all such my dear friends I would like to tell them that I have already qualified NET examination TWICE in Philosophy quite sometime ago as well as  SLET in Philosophy

when the pattern was descriptive type only.  This is my fourth NET qualification.

and I fully agree with all the suggestions made by Mr. Sunny Joseph including setting standards for evaluators and provision of answer sheets to the candidates on payment of a specific fee etc,  Kudos Joseph!!  Good work.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• Next ›
• Page