First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India
5 members
60 members
84 members
707 members
Lot of seminars in national level announced recently. Announcement appeared in most of the discussion forums, blogs and social networking sites for library professionals. Paper presentation is the attraction of the seminar. Invitation mainly for attending the conference and inviting papers for presentation. Both participants and those who submit papers are need to register and pay the fee. Often, seminar registration fee is between Rs. 500 and 5000. Organisers also receiving fund from other agencies.
Unfortunately, seminar organisers are not ensure the quality and content of the seminar. Most of the papers are equivalent to class assignment. All papers are accepted without peer reviewing. And no provision for plagiarism checking. It seems that main aim of the organisers are collect money by receiving maximum number of registration.
Seminars should encourage the advancement of knowledge. Such events should act as a platform for showcasing current trends in the topic and participants can brush up their existing knowledge. Seminar organisers must ensure the quality of the event by receiving papers only after strict checking. And organisers should not receive registration fee from participants who like to submit papers. Prize for best paper is ideal for encourage authors to prepare quality publications. Separate prizes should distribute for best paper from student and working professionals. Organisers should send certificate to authors who could not attend the seminar.
Another suggestion is select limited number of good papers and allow them sufficient time for presentation. Often authors get five minutes for presentation.
Many organisers promise that the papers will publish as a book with ISBN book, nothing will happen after the seminar. If no budget for printing, try to publish book in ebook format with ISBN. And make available online.
I request seminar organisers to rethink about existing practices followed in scholarly communication events.
Tags:
Sir,
I am agree with you points.
Mr. Kumar,
I am fully agree with your view-points. Now-a-days seminars and conferences are being arranged like opening the gate in water reservoir to release the water. Question is - "Is it a good sign for our profession?" because it may argue that the numbers of seminars and conferences are helping to share knowledge in several fields of LIS profession, especially the use of IT. But how many participants learn from attending in these so called programmes and imply that gathered knowledge in their own working places. And the most concerning fact is that participants are mainly interested to only publish and present their own papers. On the other side as mentioned by Mr. Kumar organisers are just collecting the registration fees and publishing the papers without any proper reviewing. Even most of the organisers are arranging national level seminars and publishing just the abstracts in very low quality papers promising that the full papers will be published in post-seminar/conference volume. But after the somehow managed seminar/conference inviting 2/3 professionals the organiser forgets about the promise. So, if any really scholarly full paper is there, it gets doomed.
I agree with u sir.
Obviously it is true, the main aim of seminar and conference organizers are earning the money.
I too agree with all of you but…How can resolve this issue
Let me share you…..! I too attended one conference and workshop. It was worst experience for me. Concerning conference /workshop was located in north India. Obliviously, the majority was north Indian library professionals. I was interacting with library professionals but they used to neglect me. They might be not interested in me as not published and present my own papers. Once or twice I had contacted with them by sending mails & friend requests but in vain.
Only organizer person twice had called me to give information about accommodation rates. As I may be wrong but , No other seminar/conference/workshops are as important enough as for their photo/snaps session and earning the money.
Dear Sri Vimal Kumar,
Thank you so very much for your post and for addressing an issue which seems like opening Pandora's Box!!
In fact this is presumably the first time (at least during last couple of months) I have seen a post on quality issue. Thank you once again.
What you have narrated is absolutely correct. It is really unfortunate to see lots of trash papers in various conference proceedings. But how can you prevent the trend while many of the Ph.D Theses are trash! I mean to say that while the highest degree holders are low quality individual (though most of them boast for such ill-fetched degrees), contributing quality papers in conferences is a far cry. I once posted a comment raising this issue and quite reasonably, the Doctors in our profession preferred to to keep mum!!
Actually, it has become a fashion to talk about digitization. web archiving etc. but in reality very few people seems to practice them in daily worksphere. May be their Libraries do not need them but they are competent in those areas. As such, I believe that conferences are the place where they can contribute papers befitting of their knowledge and competence. Otherwise, a big ? comes about their knowledge level.
I therefore request all the professionals to contribute quality papers in journals and books and conferences (like IFLA is asking for papers on several sections) and do justice to your qualifications otherwise they will be nothing but a bunch of trash papers!!
Siddhartha s. Ray, Calcutta
Can you forward your reply to LISFORUM?
Dear Sri Vimal Kumar,
Thanks for your comment/suggestion. However, I personally feel that many members might be watching this discussion with mixed feelings. My idea was to convey the message as an old professional because often I have seen young professionals doing pathetic in interviews. Even persons with 10+ years experience are no exception. In a recent interview, a person with M.Lib& M.Phil could not clarify the difference between Systematic Bibliography and Bibliometry!! and never-the-less his/her M.Phil dissertation topic was citation analysis of Ph.D. Theses (Which was actually nothing but count of referencing pattern!!). I was shocked and sorry to see the knowledge level of that individual who came for a post which was supervisory in nature and offered a salary of 38+K per month.
So, I don't think that there is any necessary to forward my reply to LISFORUM as it will not make any difference at all.
Regards,
Siddhartha s. Ray, Calcutta
It is true. Mostly it is fetching points required for participants with the publication of papers, presentations in seminars and to the organizers also along with the registration fee. This trend is becoming more because UGC is insisting on securing points to get higher pay scales and promotions in colleges and universities under CAS. Though this trend is healthy for promoting advancements in profession and also professionals, it, unfortunately became a routine and stale activity, since most of them are not following the best practices. Your suggestions are very good.
You mentioned that "Organisers should send certificate to authors who could not attend the seminar". I observed in many Conferences/seminars that only presented papers or registered (with fee) papers will be published in conference volume. This is one way arresting authors from simply writing for publication sake without attending the event.
"Organisers should send certificate to authors who could not attend the seminar".
I meant that, if authors get certificate as proof of paper accepted and published in conference volume.
This certificate can act as an evidence of his paper accepted. While apply for higher posts, this certificate is helpful. Organizers should ensure that whether author attend the event and present the paper on dies. In certain cases authors are not able to attend the seminar due to busy work schedule or event organized in far places.
Dear Sri Vimal Kumar,
I am sorry that I can not accept your point as far the present situation prevails where there is no quality control mechanism in acceptance of papers in seminars and I rather share Ms. V.J. Suseela's views. Yes, exactly, contributing papers has become a trend especially for working College Librarians and other UGC ruled organizations as soon as the UGC has insisted on securing points. I have recently ahd an oppertunity to check bio-data of some such individuals having over 10+ years of experience and found that most of them (6 out of 7) had their first publication in late 2010 and that too in local level journal and seminars. Now, if this is the situation, then gathering certificates from seminar organizers will be a very handy solution. However, the same thing is also applicable to teaching communities as well. One can easily notice mushrooming of local journals at college and university departments with ISSNs. Your point can be acceptable only when there will be a strict quality control measure. However, as I have seen, organizers generally issue certificates to attendees. It does not always matter (especially for conferences abroad) whether an individual personally attended the conference, if his/her full paper is published, that will suffice. I personally have several such papers where I could not attend the conferences because of nonavailability of sponsorship and I have precisely mentioned the fact in the list of my publications and I have retained (till today!) their letter of acceptance of my paper as proof. Even more interestingly, in some cases, I received queries/feed backs from our co-professionals abroad about contents of my papers which I could not present personally!! I have mentioned these facts only to convey that there is no harm if anybody can not attend a conference personally if the organisers adhere to some qualitative standard in acceptance of papers.
Sincerely,
Siddhartha S. Ray, Calcutta
© 2024 Created by Dr. Badan Barman.
Powered by