LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

Narendra Pal shared a profile on Facebook
yesterday
Profile IconLIS Links now has birthdays
yesterday
Dr. U. Pramanathan posted blog posts
yesterday
Dr. U. Pramanathan posted events
yesterday
Dr. U. Pramanathan updated their profile
Wednesday
Urvashi kaushik replied to Sunil K Upneja's discussion Clarification regarding CAS promotion of College Librarian
Wednesday
S. Jaffer Basha left a comment for Dr Jolly Varghese U
Tuesday
Dr. U. Pramanathan posted blog posts
Tuesday
Dr. U. Pramanathan posted events
Tuesday
ASHOKKUMAR SINGH commented on Dr. U. Pramanathan's blog post Recruitment of Librarian Gr.II/Librarian Senior, Assistant Librarian, Library Restorer & Documentist @ Baba Farid University of Health Sciences (BFUHS), Faridkot, Punjab.
Tuesday
ASHOKKUMAR SINGH commented on Dr. U. Pramanathan's blog post Recruitment of Librarian Gr.II/Librarian Senior, Assistant Librarian, Library Restorer & Documentist @ Baba Farid University of Health Sciences (BFUHS), Faridkot, Punjab.
Tuesday
Sanraj Roy posted an event
Thumbnail

Advanced Training programme on Bibliometrics and Research Output Analysis at Library Network Centre, Infocity, Gandhinagar382007, Gujarat, India.

December 2, 2024 to December 6, 2024
Monday
SHWETHA KV posted a discussion
Monday
Sunil K Upneja posted a discussion
Monday
Dr. Mahabaleshwara Rao Baikady posted an event

6th NACML (National Conference on Management of Modern Libraries) - 2025 at Dr. TMA Pai Hall

February 21, 2025 at 8am to February 22, 2025 at 5pm
Monday
Saanvi Singh posted a status
"School Librarian Vacancy for 125 Post in Tripura: https://shorturl.at/GEgWl"
Saturday
Urvashi kaushik and Vikram Jain are now friends
Nov 15
Urvashi kaushik replied to Mrs. Vishakha R. Rajguru's discussion Evidence for CBSE Librarians Status in Maharashtra or Maharashtra govt.
Nov 15
Urvashi kaushik replied to Mrs. Vishakha R. Rajguru's discussion Evidence for CBSE Librarians Status in Maharashtra or Maharashtra govt.
Nov 15
Profile IconRenuka M Yalamali, SAMEER SAI PAINKRA, Annanya and 6 more joined LIS Links
Nov 15

Unfair Selection in Walk-in interview for Library and Information Science Professionals in IGNOU, New Delhi on July 8, 2016 (Total Posts = 45)

Dear all Library professional

I was one of the candidate ,who appear in walk in interview in IGNOU University for the post of project asst.on dated 8-07-2016..But I am very disheartened and you will be surprise to know the result of written exam .

There was very unfair selection process for the total candidate attend this interview around 400 and total post is 15 but after the written exam result they have selected only 21 candidate  for interview i think this very unfair to all library professional those have attend this written exam .They have played discrimination  with most of the candidates .

because according to interview rules  & regulation there must be  3 candidate  for one post but they have selected only 21 candidates for 15 post and this is unjustified .

with disheartened

Views: 1142

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Dear Sri Vikram RaghuVanshi,

I read your post with a heavy heart.It is indeed painful for all aspirant candidates if they do not get opportunity to face the final round of selection.

I sincerely hope that you will get even better opportunity for more prospective career building.

However, regarding selection process normally, certain prefixed criteria are set especially when applicants are more and vacancies are less. Often the authority fix a particular percentage of marks as minimum. They are treated as MINIMUM QUALIFYING MARKS (MQMs) in the written tests. Admittedly, there is no fixed rules of such marking as far as I know but normally it lies between 40% to 50% Candidates scoring above this fixed MQMs are called for interview.

Honestly speaking, I have no idea about the norms fixed by the IGNOU. Even I do not know whether they had any prefixed norms at all, but generally speaking only the candidates scored above the MQMs are called for interview. Even the MQMs are raised "on the spot"  to minimize the number of interviewees!! which however, seems to be irrational to me (because in the same philosophy the MQMs can be decreased at any time if sufficient number of people are not found to score beyond the prefixed MQMs and re-advertising for the same vacancy with arrangement for another round of Written Tests & Interview seems to be critical, complicated and time consuming)

The IGNOU authority, if they had any prefixed norms, should have mentioned this at the very beginning without disclosing the MQMs. Had they done so, I feel people were not so frustrated! Never-the-less there had been transparency throughout the entire process. It is a pity that in our country the recruiters often do not try to understand the agony of the applicants and devise suitable norms for recruitment and make such norms known to the applicants. As I suspect sometimes they willingly do not care for such issues as they well understand that there is no dearth of candidates in the market but the recruiters should have a sense of concern and sympathy towards the applicants.

Sincerely,

Siddhartha S. Ray

Dear respected S.S.Ray

Thanks for your kind attention toward my write-up .I hope your are a senior person in the field of library & information science ,Please always look forward the problem of unemployed professional i the field of library & information science  . Do better for them .

RSS

© 2024   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop