First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India
The qualifying criteria for June-2012
“Those candidates who had made it to the consideration zone, i.e., those who received a minimum of 40%, 40% & 50% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and PaperIII respectively for General Category; 35%, 35% & 45% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III respectively for OBC (Non-creamy layer) Category and 35%, 35% &
40% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III respectively for SC/ST/PWD Category and those who secured aggregate percentage (obtained by combining marks of Paper-I, II & III) of 65% for `General category, 60% for OBC (Non-creamy layer) and 55% for SC/ST/PWD category candidates (This is the same criterion as decided by the earlier Moderation Committee).
OR
Those candidates who figure among top 7% of all the candidates who appeared in NET; this shall be calculated separately for each discipline and for each category (SC/ST/OBC(Non Creamy Layer)/PWD). Accordingly a cut-off will be determined for each subject and each category for this purpose. In case of tie (when several students have same identical aggregate marks) all the candidates appearing at the
qualifying marks shall be included. Candidates who do not secure minimum required score in each paper and are therefore not in the consideration zone, will not be included in this list even if they fall among the top 7% within their subject and category.”
Original Post: June 2012 exam criteria.
Tags:
I need top 7% list of candidates (SC/ST) who qualified in Library and Information Science(code:59)subject .
nthing..its ALL idiotic...they are disclosing the criteria of june 12 NOW..so that they dnt get scoldings frm HC...aab ja ke unhone criteria disclose kiya hai...lekin 21st ko HC me hearing hai..wil hv to wait till that time...
But Nilofar ji 18th January ke pehle in sab logon ko SC ne instructions diya tha ke Results should be displayed on the basis of old criteria. Then why this drama. Have they taken Law in their own hand that they dont want to listen to anybody even Supreme court of India.
Really confused about UGC Great Drama. PLaying with the life and career of the student.This is quality education which they want to enhance.
nthing..its ALL idiotic...they are disclosing the criteria of june 12 NOW..so that they dnt get scoldings frm HC...aab ja ke unhone criteria disclose kiya hai...lekin 21st ko HC me hearing hai..wil hv to wait till that time...
Dear friends, this was old criteria for qualifying the candidates. UGC is not declare any new criteria as per guide lines of courts.
It is utter nonsense from the part of UGC announcing the qualifying criteria for June-2012 in january 2013. Why did they keep it as secret all these months and they felt it to announce only when they found case in the court is going against them. It is like after completing the race and giving the prices away still the authority change rules for the race. See meanwhile another exam in Dec has completed. I'm sure if we fight hard we will win.
the issue is now in the Kerala High Court (KHC). UGC perhaps should avoid to open any criteria, because let the respective High Court decide first, after that both party has right to approach further. Meanwhile S C have already ordered to follow minimum Cut Off as per notification.
by doing so much, UGC creating more and more dough about itself.
Moreover, my personal trust is on K H C, due to their honesty, education & awareness.
You are right Mr Jomy Jose. It is old Criteria not a New. First result published by UGC on basis of 65% , 60% and 55% and supplementary result top 7% list of candidates in all subject. for more details see the following supplementary result criteria
it is not new criteria old one only ugc net bearu just gets up from the deep sleeping they published the criteria after 2 to three months after publication of the net results
this shows UGC working very actively "the dog bow....after six months"
© 2024 Created by Dr. Badan Barman. Powered by