LIS Links
First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India
LIS Links Becoming More Social
Birthdays
Birthdays Today
Latest Activity
Online Workshop on "Unlock Bibliometric Insights-Bibliometric Analysis with Open-Source Tools"
November 30, 2024 at 6pm to December 1, 2024 at 7pmRRLF Sponsored Two-Day International Conference on 'Building Sustainable Libraries in Connecting Communities: Librarianship, Technology, and Collaboration'
February 7, 2025 at 6pm to February 8, 2025 at 7pmRe-Imagining Libraries (ReIL-2025): National Conference on Balancing Tradition and Innovation in a Digital Era
January 10, 2025 from 6pm to 7pm
Advertisement for Deputy Librarian Group A position against lien vacancy in Tripura University, Agartala, Tripura
Walk-in-Interview Notification for Engaging of Assistant Librarian (Temporary) @ Dr. G. Ramachandran Library, Gandhigram Rural Institute (Deemed to be University), Dindigul, Tamilnadu.
Markaz Group of Schools, Karanthur, Kozhikode Kerala-673571 are Hiring
The South Asian University, New Delhi and LIS Academy, Bangalore are organising the Global Library Summit–2025 during 5-7 February 2025 at Dr.Ambedkar International Centre, Janpath, New Delhi
February 5, 2025 at 6pm to February 7, 2025 at 7pmDELNET Annual Lecture: "Sharing as Strength: Libraries as Connection Machines" by Prof. Emily Drabinski, Past President, ALA, USA, on Tuesday, December 3, 2024, at 11:30 AM IST.
December 3, 2024 from 11:30am to 1pmRefresher Course in LIS at UGC-Malaviya Mission Teacher Training Centre (MMTTC), University of Rajasthan, Jaipur
January 6, 2025 at 6pm to January 18, 2025 at 7pm
Advanced Training programme on Bibliometrics and Research Output Analysis at Library Network Centre, Infocity, Gandhinagar382007, Gujarat, India.
6th NACML (National Conference on Management of Modern Libraries) - 2025 at Dr. TMA Pai Hall
UGC appeal on NET posted for January 21
Source The hindu 11/01/2013
KOCHI: A Division Bench of the Kerala High Court on Thurs-day posted for final hearing on January 2I an appeal filed by the UGC against a single judge's verdict quashing the new qualifying criteria pre-scribed by the UGC in the Na-tional Eligibility Test for lectureships.The single judge had heid that the UGC regulations did not confer any right on the UGC to fix a high mark after holding the NET. Nor could such criteria be introduced through regulation just be-fore the announcement of the resuits by executive orders. The introduction of the new criteria was not support-ed by the law. As per the new criteria, candidates in the general category who had scored an aggregate of 65 per cent for all the three papers would be eligible for lecture-ship. While the OBC candi-dates needed 60 per cent, the SC/ST candidates needed 55 aa per cenl.The single judge had also declared that the petitioners who had obtained separate minimum marks prescribed in the UGC notification had cleared the NET. The court had ordered that they should be given the necessary certif-icates in a month. When the appeal came up for hearing before the Bench comprising Chief Justice Manjula Chellur and Justice K.Vinod Chandran, counsel for the UGC S.Krishnamoor-thy contended that the High Court had no right to make a declaration regarding the re-sult of a test.It had been clearly stated in the original notification that the candidates should obtain minimum required marks in each paper separately. It had also been said that the qual-ifring criteria for Junior Re-search Fellowship and eligibiiity for lectureship would be decided by the UGC before the declaration of results. It was a moderation com-mittee appointed by the UGC and consisting of senior aca-demicians who had recom-mended that the general.OBC (non-creamy layer) and the SC/ST candidates wouldbe required to obtain an ag-gregate percentage of 65, 60 and 55 respectively in addi-tion to the paper-wise mini-mum percentage asqualifoing criteria. The notiflcation had clear-ly said that the final cut-off marks shall be decided by the commission before the decla-ration of results. The single judge's ruling would Iower the standard of education.The appeal said that in or-der to maintain hig! stan-dards in education, prescription of an aggregate percentage in an examination was well within the powers of the UGC.Prescribing the qualiffing criteria by flxing an aggregate percentage could not be called change of rules in themiddle of the test
Views: 3689
Replies to This Forum
-
Permalink Reply by MICHAEL on
-
Just my Opinion....
If a +2 Students appear for the final exam with a criteria that if he got 70/200 then he can pass.. then after writing the examination if he has instructed that only if you got 100/200 then only you can qualify. Is this a favorable decision ? Is this a favorable decision for the students life or his mental agony?...
This is the similar case for the NET/SET Students.. This instruction is really hurting both mentally & physically.
In my opinion this is cheating & against human morality.
Before Examination UGC declared 35 - 35 - 40 for each paper.
Then at the time of result declaration they fixed cut off as 55-60-65 for SC-OBC-OC for better quality improvement in Education.
If this is the case then how they came forward to pass a Computer science student for just 42 marks. How they compromise that for them. Is this a correct Justice. Law should be equal for all. Cheating or Betrayal is against humanity human nature & behavior & this is happened in this case.
I Just Want to ask that if Students prepare on the basis of earlier criteria & at the time of result they are been deceived & betrayed then is that favorable . In my Opinion this is against humanity., Against Human behavior. Students are not a astrologer to predict the Score before Examination.
The Students are really mentally affected & disappointed rather i will say they are been cheated & affected by forgery.
The decision taken by Kerala high court is perfect there is no rights to interfere exam criteria after examination.
So Just i want to conclude that UGC must take a proper decision before Exam & not to confuse or interfere after examination. If Quality Education is needed then treat all students equally & not take any decision which really affect students mentality.
Students won't get jobs based on your UGC certification. They have to go further & further on merit basis for jobs.
Just take a right decision so that all are compromised.
And Results declared in all favors.
Hereafter please take care of criteria before examination.
-
Permalink Reply by NILOFER SHAIKH on
-
i completely AGREE WID u Sir..!! NET is juz a QUALIFYING EXAM & NOT A COMPETITIVE EXAM wherein u MUST hav merit....
God alone knows y UGC cundt understand tis SIMPLE fact !!!
:(
-
Permalink Reply by pallavi on
-
I am not able to understand why u ppl are creating complicity to understand the thing...
Yes NET is not competitive exam....
hav u heard about CAT.MAT Or GATE these all not a cometitive exmas but these have percentile criteria for students, it's not possible.......pls understand the UGC criteria to maintain the level of NET qualifying student..........
-
Permalink Reply by M. Shiva Reddy on
-
CAT MAT GATE are the tests where the entry will give if a GATE scorer will not face any other test or interview for admission in M.Tech based on the score the admission process will be completed.
But here the NET eligibility will not provide such facility. if any one wants to apply for any post he/she has to write the test the concerned department will be conducted.
There is a difference between CAT MAT GATE and NET.
-
-
UGC has filed Writ Appeal with case no. 44/2013 on 10.01.2013 and we can checkout the case status from time to time in the website http://courtnic.nic.in/kerala_new/content.asp
all of us should wait till disposal of this case and positive result will come for the Students.
-
-
Roll No Subject Code Name Paper-I Paper-II Paper-III Aggregate
46870286 87 THIRUPATHI GADIGOPPULA 38.00% 44.00% 38.36% 39.88%
Dear Ma'am... Ok I Agree with you...
then can you please clarify why the same UGC considered 39.88% for passing the CS student in NET/SET Exam.
Is this the UGC level of maintaining Qualified NET student?
Law should be equal for each & every one..
-
Permalink Reply by Iranna Shettar on
-
All the Numbers which are listed here are related to only 1 subject i.e. Computer Science and Applications (with Subject Code: 87), other than this subject in any other Subjects also is this happened?
With this much lower percentage UGC might have cleared the Candidates?
-
Permalink Reply by Arshad Ali on
-
please see
that supplementary of NET result is almost below 50% on average.
11300756, 52%
41380138 48%
74870625 45%
46871699,47% 4687106644% 46874351 44% and so on in every subject and so many are there in list of supplementary result June 2012.
these should be discussed at Krala High Court, on 21 January 2013.
-
Permalink Reply by Ritesh Pant on
-
74870625 45%
YES YE TO BOHAT BARA FRAUD HAI MAE TO HALKE MAE LE RAHA THA. ISKA MATLAB TO ugc HAR SAAL BOHAT DHANDLI KARTI HOGI. OH! MY GOD HAM TO HAMESHA ISH ORGANISATION KO EK BOHAT LEARNED BODY MANTE RAHE. YE TO SACH MAE FRAUD NIKLI. HE BHAGWAN YE TO RAPE CASE WALI INCIDENT KE SAMAN HAI. STUDENT KI ATMA KA RAPE KIYA HAI UGC NE. AAB KIS RIGHTS SE WO ENTRANCE EXAM ORGNISE KARA RAHI HAI. ISHE ORGANISATION KO ILLEGAL BODY KO TURANT SUPREME COURT NE ASAWADHANIK KARAR DETE HUE ISKE MANAGEMENT BODY KO JAIL BHEJ DENA CHAHIYE. IN SALAON KE TO DEGREE NAHI CHAHIYE HAME. MAN KAR RAHA HAI GANDI GANDI GALIYAN DUN.
AAB TO MAE COURT MAE IN SAB KO FANSI DENE KE LIYE APPEAL KARWANA CHATA HAUN. YE SALE TO HAMRI EDUCATION, IMOTIONS KE SATH KHEL RAHE HAIN. YE KAHIN PAISE TO NAHI LETE PASS KARNE KE LIYE. CHI WISHWASH UTH GAYA. KYA KYA STUDY KYA THE YE UNIVERSITIES KO 100% ASSISTANCE DETE HAI. KUCH NAHI DETE 5 YEAR PLANNING KE PAISE MAE BHI GHOTLA KARTE HONGE. SAME ON UGC.
-
Permalink Reply by Dr sunil tiwari on
-
Dear michael pls see the mork list of givin roll no 46870286 in the ugc website... 38, 44, 40, 44.57%..... ugc change the marks of billow candidates.... who pass the net by supplementary result.
-
-
ugc removed the result from the list i think????????? please checkout once???
-
Permalink Reply by Joginder S Ahlawat on
-
Join this group for updates on Petition Against UGC NET JUNE 2012
© 2024 Created by Dr. Badan Barman.
Powered by
