Replies to This Forum

Permalink Reply by Arshad Ali on January 14, 2013 at 18:40

please requested to you communicate in you state to your friends. subject no bar, communicate to all ( So. Scs., Scs. Lnaguages and humanities etc.)

73872953 45.14%

74870625 45.71%

07630098 50.86%

41380138 48%

11300266 53.14%

56870439 52%

46871650 (46.86%)

46871699 (47.43%)

46873698 (48.57%)

46872544 (45.14%)

46871897 (51.43%

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Joginder S Ahlawat on January 12, 2013 at 15:57

click this link for updates on UGC NET JUNE 2012

Petition Against UGC NET JUNE 2012

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Arshad Ali on January 14, 2013 at 18:42

i have no face book account.

can you write some words on LIS LINK please.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Arshad Ali on January 14, 2013 at 18:28

UGC has not shown / mentioned any cut off regarding supplement result June 2012 clearly, obviously this is showing above result of UGC.

therefore this issue earlier also raised no dough, but this is the real time to communicate with friends to reach the issue to the Kerala High Court before 21 January, 2013. so that this can also be discussed during hearing in the Court of Kerala.

thanks   

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Iranna Shettar on January 14, 2013 at 19:22

OK, Thanks

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Arshad Ali on January 14, 2013 at 22:54

A lot of variation and differences subjects wise CUT OFF, in some subject 46.29% for Gen. while in other subjects 65% for general.
But UGC announced before the result 65% for Gen., 60% for OBC & 55% for SC/SC/PWD category wise. there were no variation at that time. But when you asked the information immediately they changed subject wise Cut Off, if it is suppose ok, then why UGC has not mentioned such Subject Wise Cut Off Criterion in December, 2012 NET exam. UGc only mentioned top 15% category wise & subject wise would be qualified NET & JRF those who will fulfill minimum qualifying criteria Category Wise.
i think there is a dough in RTI reply. if UGC suddenly changed such criteria, why UGC could not publish on UGC website. please think & rethink on this UGC sudden change criterion. ??????

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Nilanjan Sen on January 14, 2013 at 19:14

Why did UGC deprive OBC & SC/ST candidates ??

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Iranna Shettar on January 14, 2013 at 20:59

For Library Science (Subj. Code: 59):

General: 504 Qualified (Cut-Off: 63.43 %)
OBC: 352 Qualified (Cut-Off: 60.00 %)
PWD: 18 Qualified (Cut-Off: 55.00%)
SC/ST: 294 Qualified (Cut-Off: 55.00 %)

 

Thanks to Jomy for Sharing RTI Reply for Subject wise & Category wise cut off for Lectureship only.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Arshad Ali on January 14, 2013 at 21:07

07630098 50.86%

41380138 48%

11300266 53.14%

what about the above numbers

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by pankaj gupta on January 14, 2013 at 21:40

Jomy jose sir,

  this subject wise cut off list is use full for kerla high court case ?.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Arshad Ali on January 15, 2013 at 0:36

in some subject cut off is high while in some subject the cut off is so low.

like LIS 63.43 %

while in Computer Sc. 46.29

this is justice by UGC, who is responsible for maintaining standards / qualities in Higher Education.

sir in my understanding this is neither digestable nor justice to fix such Cut Off.

i don't believe on this particular information. even not a single man would accept this this type of cut off.   

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Iranna Shettar on January 15, 2013 at 0:43

Do you think in each Institute there will be an equivalent number of Teachers in a Department as equivalent to Number of Librarians in a Library?

 

If “Yes” then in each Subject equal number of Candidates to be Cleared….

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page