LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

Narendra Pal shared a profile on Facebook
yesterday
Profile IconLIS Links now has birthdays
yesterday
Dr. U. Pramanathan posted blog posts
yesterday
Dr. U. Pramanathan posted events
yesterday
Dr. U. Pramanathan updated their profile
Wednesday
Urvashi kaushik replied to Sunil K Upneja's discussion Clarification regarding CAS promotion of College Librarian
Wednesday
S. Jaffer Basha left a comment for Dr Jolly Varghese U
Tuesday
Dr. U. Pramanathan posted blog posts
Tuesday
Dr. U. Pramanathan posted events
Tuesday
ASHOKKUMAR SINGH commented on Dr. U. Pramanathan's blog post Recruitment of Librarian Gr.II/Librarian Senior, Assistant Librarian, Library Restorer & Documentist @ Baba Farid University of Health Sciences (BFUHS), Faridkot, Punjab.
Tuesday
ASHOKKUMAR SINGH commented on Dr. U. Pramanathan's blog post Recruitment of Librarian Gr.II/Librarian Senior, Assistant Librarian, Library Restorer & Documentist @ Baba Farid University of Health Sciences (BFUHS), Faridkot, Punjab.
Tuesday
Sanraj Roy posted an event
Thumbnail

Advanced Training programme on Bibliometrics and Research Output Analysis at Library Network Centre, Infocity, Gandhinagar382007, Gujarat, India.

December 2, 2024 to December 6, 2024
Monday
SHWETHA KV posted a discussion
Monday
Sunil K Upneja posted a discussion
Monday
Dr. Mahabaleshwara Rao Baikady posted an event

6th NACML (National Conference on Management of Modern Libraries) - 2025 at Dr. TMA Pai Hall

February 21, 2025 at 8am to February 22, 2025 at 5pm
Monday
Saanvi Singh posted a status
"School Librarian Vacancy for 125 Post in Tripura: https://shorturl.at/GEgWl"
Saturday
Urvashi kaushik and Vikram Jain are now friends
Nov 15
Urvashi kaushik replied to Mrs. Vishakha R. Rajguru's discussion Evidence for CBSE Librarians Status in Maharashtra or Maharashtra govt.
Nov 15
Urvashi kaushik replied to Mrs. Vishakha R. Rajguru's discussion Evidence for CBSE Librarians Status in Maharashtra or Maharashtra govt.
Nov 15
Profile IconRenuka M Yalamali, SAMEER SAI PAINKRA, Annanya and 6 more joined LIS Links
Nov 15

Dear professionals,

I would like to know the nominal charges for collecting fine for overdue,loss of book,loss of library token,damage of books,as it differs from library to library.

Views: 506

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Yes, it is a very challenging issues in library services. The Different causes for charging to the libary clienetele may not be same. Therefore, it would be very helpful to you to

design a proposal and discussed in the Library Committee Meeting and getting approval as part of the Library Rules. Before to introdue the same it has to be circulated well in advance for information to the all categories of library users. Now, Let me say what should be the structure for collecting fine?  

a) For Over Due: Re 1/- for per delayed working day ( Holiday may not be taken into considerations);

b) For Loss /Damage of Library Books: i) try to procure the books if available in the market and actual payment will be made by the concern users,

                                          ii) If not availbale in the market then money can be realized in two ways;

                                           *) Try to collect the current price of the books of same publishers for the same pages and  determine the cost of the lost books accordingly (keeping in mind the institutional interest for determining the cost of the lost books) OR

                                          **) a) If the book is published before 1940 then the user should have to pay 100 times of the price noted in the Library Accession Register.

                                               b) If the book is published before 1960 then the user should have to pay  40 times of the price noted in the Library Accession Register.

                                               c) If the book is published before 1980 then the user should have to pay 10 times of the price noted in the Library Accession Register.

                                               d) If the book is published before 1990 then the user should have to pay 5 times of the price noted in the Library Accession Register.

                                               e) If the book is published before 2000 then the user should have to pay 3 times of the price noted in the Library Accession Register.

                                                f) If the book is published before 2010 then the user should have to pay 1.5 times of the price noted in the Library Accession Register.

                                                f) If the book is published after 2000 then the user should have to pay the actual price noted in the Library Accession Register.

[Please note that one can change / re-fix how many times of the accession price they will collect from the users as Cost of the lost books, because the proposed structured is a draft and must be get approval from the appropriate authority and it is to be kept in mind this is some sorts of penalty/punishment].

c) For loss of Library Card/Token etc.: One application is to submitted which will be duly forwarded by the HOD with FIR ( only for lost of Library Card) to the Library and Rs. 100/- for Duplicate Library card and Rs. 50/- may be charged as fine for lost of Libray token etc.

I hope this help you to deisign a policy for collecting fine for issuing 'NO DUES' certificate to the Library users and at the same time I do seek the discurrion over the proposal. Feel free to contact with me for further clarification, if required I am available through nimaichand.saha@visva-Bhaarti.ac.in or ncsaha.72@gmail.com.

Dear NIMAI CHAND SAHA sir,

Thank you very much for your kind information.

with regards,

A.Mala

Dear Raja sir,

Thanks a lot for sending your valuable suggestion.

with regards,

A.Mala

RSS

© 2024   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop