LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

Narendra Pal shared a profile on Facebook
Thursday
Profile IconLIS Links now has birthdays
Thursday
Dr. U. Pramanathan posted blog posts
Thursday
Dr. U. Pramanathan posted events
Thursday
Dr. U. Pramanathan updated their profile
Wednesday
Urvashi kaushik replied to Sunil K Upneja's discussion Clarification regarding CAS promotion of College Librarian
Wednesday
S. Jaffer Basha left a comment for Dr Jolly Varghese U
Tuesday
Dr. U. Pramanathan posted blog posts
Tuesday
Dr. U. Pramanathan posted events
Tuesday
ASHOKKUMAR SINGH commented on Dr. U. Pramanathan's blog post Recruitment of Librarian Gr.II/Librarian Senior, Assistant Librarian, Library Restorer & Documentist @ Baba Farid University of Health Sciences (BFUHS), Faridkot, Punjab.
Tuesday
ASHOKKUMAR SINGH commented on Dr. U. Pramanathan's blog post Recruitment of Librarian Gr.II/Librarian Senior, Assistant Librarian, Library Restorer & Documentist @ Baba Farid University of Health Sciences (BFUHS), Faridkot, Punjab.
Tuesday
Sanraj Roy posted an event
Thumbnail

Advanced Training programme on Bibliometrics and Research Output Analysis at Library Network Centre, Infocity, Gandhinagar382007, Gujarat, India.

December 2, 2024 to December 6, 2024
Nov 17
SHWETHA KV posted a discussion
Nov 17
Sunil K Upneja posted a discussion
Nov 17
Dr. Mahabaleshwara Rao Baikady posted an event

6th NACML (National Conference on Management of Modern Libraries) - 2025 at Dr. TMA Pai Hall

February 21, 2025 at 8am to February 22, 2025 at 5pm
Nov 17
Saanvi Singh posted a status
"School Librarian Vacancy for 125 Post in Tripura: https://shorturl.at/GEgWl"
Nov 16
Urvashi kaushik and Vikram Jain are now friends
Nov 15
Urvashi kaushik replied to Mrs. Vishakha R. Rajguru's discussion Evidence for CBSE Librarians Status in Maharashtra or Maharashtra govt.
Nov 15
Urvashi kaushik replied to Mrs. Vishakha R. Rajguru's discussion Evidence for CBSE Librarians Status in Maharashtra or Maharashtra govt.
Nov 15
Profile IconRenuka M Yalamali, SAMEER SAI PAINKRA, Annanya and 6 more joined LIS Links
Nov 15

Category

Qualifying Cut-off Marks for  in Eligibility for Lectureship UGC-NET held on JUNE 2012

 

Paper-I

Paper-II

Paper-I + Paper-II

Paper-III

Paper-I + Paper-II + Paper-III

GEN

40 (40%)

40 (40%)

100 (50%)

 82-84 (55%)

206-210(60%)

OBC(NCL)

35 (35%)

35 (35%)

90(45%)

74-76 (50%)

188-192(55%)

SC/ST/PH/VH

35 (35%)

35 (35%)

80(40%)

66-68 (45%)

174-178 (50%)

 

 

 

 

Category

Qualifying Cut-off Marks for  in Eligibility for JRF  UGC-NET held on

JUNE 2012

 

Paper-I

Paper-II

Paper-I + Paper-II

Paper-III

Paper-I + Paper-II + Paper-III

GEN

60 (60%)

60 (60%)

120 (60%)

 

 

245 (70%)

OBC(NCL)

55 (55%)

55 (55%)

110(55%)

228 (65%)

SC/ST/PH/VH

55 (55%)

55 (55%)

100(50%)

210 (60%)

Views: 34424

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Dear Colleagues,

 Please Dont Create Confusion by telling Cut Off Marks and all ok

 what and all you people are thinking know about these Cut Marks and all,

UGC cant change any rule as and when they want ok.

They are clearly mentioned in the June 2012 Notification rule and regulation.

same thing they have to follow as it is for this June Exam  ..!!!  

They cant change any New Rules for this June 2012 EXAM.

if they want to change any criteria, they can change for upcoming  DEC 2012 EXAM.

Hence i request to all those who have got Eligible Marks in June 2012 Exam,

Be Calm and wait for your final Result. 

Please don't think too about any NET Cut Off Marks all.

Thanking You,

Rajashekhar M Patil

result kab niklega? kisi ko pata hai kya?

why u r not properly calculation how can u say 110 and 120 to be of 50% and 60% when paper was out of 150 and in final 245 and 228 u have calculated out of 350 in the jrf cut off section

In NET-June 2012,Third paper was of 150 marks not 200.... so 110 marks in paper-III means 73% not 55% & 100 marks means 66% not 50% 

It is very sad & shameful that such people who even can't calculate the percentage correctly are in teaching in our country....

Mr. Dumb when u don't know the situation do not comment on calculation, that guy was referring to the old paper when it used to be out of 200, in the very cut 0ff marks itself has too many faults and has created all sorts of confusion., i should say you dont understand ugc net cut off marks nor you have able to solve what is given as cut off marks, over all u r a dumb and trying to be over smart though u dont know anything so keep ur suggestion with yourself only

RSS

© 2024   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop