Latest Activity

sangeeta sharma is attending Dr. Shamim Aktar Munshi's event
yesterday
Kanika sharma and Ankit Jaiswal are now friends
Saturday
Nagendra N updated their profile
Thursday
Pallavi Sushant Sapkal and S. Jaffer Basha are now friends
Mar 22
Dr. Divyanshu Gupta updated their profile
Mar 20
Nilesh and Dr. Badan Barman are now friends
Mar 19
Dr. Gulshan Kumar Sachdeva updated their profile
Mar 17
Dr. Gulshan Kumar Sachdeva and sandeep shukla are now friends
Mar 17
Devendra Parker joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Mar 17
Manoj Kumar updated their profile
Mar 15
Ranjansen Shende updated their profile
Mar 15
Ku. Dipti Lodwal joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Mar 13
Ku. Dipti Lodwal joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Mar 13
Ku. Dipti Lodwal left a comment for Arun kumar Sirla
Mar 13
Ku. Dipti Lodwal left a comment for Vikrant Dubey
Mar 13
Ku. Dipti Lodwal posted a status
Mar 13
Ku. Dipti Lodwal commented on Ku. Dipti Lodwal's event 'Two Days International Seminar'
Mar 12
sangeeta sharma is attending Dr. Ashis Biswas's event
Mar 11
sangeeta sharma commented on Ku. Dipti Lodwal's event 'Two Days International Seminar'
Mar 11
sangeeta sharma updated their profile
Mar 11

Act against defaulting institutions: Bombay HC to govt

NAGPUR: The Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court has directed the Maharashtra government to examine to what extent the benefits of increased fee-structure have passed on to teachers and, particularly, to retired employees.
 
A division bench consisting of judges SC Dharmadhikari and MT Joshi issued the directives while hearing a petition filed by retired principal Baban Narad seeking implementation of the recommendations of fifth and sixth pay commissions by his employer Shivaji Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and its unaided college NS Ganguwar College of Education, Gadchiroli.
 
The judges have asked the government to find out if there are any lapses in the implementation and to inform them what action it intends to take against the defaulting institutions. The court has also instructed the government to direct the state higher education secretary to treat the petition as illustration and steps within three months from the date of this order.
 
The court has also stated that if any amount is payable to the petitioner by his employer and its management, the secretary should issue appropriate orders and ensure that the petitioner gets his dues in accordance with the two panels' recommendations.
 
DN Mathur appeared for the petitioner, while VN Morande (employer-institution) and Ambareesh Joshi (state) represented the respondents.

Source | Times of India | 7 August 2012

Views: 75

Reply to This

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp