LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

Nayana Nair updated their profile
13 hours ago
PRASANNA R updated their profile
Sunday
Kanika sharma might attend Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN's event
Saturday
Dr. Asha Peter updated their profile
Sep 10
Dr. Asha Peter is now friends with ANILKUMAR.R, Dr. Badan Barman and VIJAYAKUMAR V
Sep 10
jai prakash kumar updated their profile
Sep 9
Saradhambal V updated their profile
Sep 7
neema shukla updated their profile
Sep 7
Dr. Bhakti Gala and KUMAR RAJ are now friends
Sep 6
Sebastine Robert updated their profile
Sep 3
MAYUR JAIN left a comment for Dev prajapati
Sep 2
Shivaganga salotagi updated their profile
Aug 30
Ankit Jaiswal updated their profile
Aug 26
S RAVI posted a status
Aug 24
S RAVI posted a status
""Call for Chapter Contribution in Editorial Book "…"
Aug 24
M Vineesh Kumar joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Aug 15
Dr. REKHRAJ SAHU updated their profile
Aug 15
Manju Meerwal updated their profile
Aug 13
dibyajyoti patgiri and BITUPON DOLEY are now friends
Aug 11
preeti verma updated their profile
Aug 11

Act against defaulting institutions: Bombay HC to govt

NAGPUR: The Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court has directed the Maharashtra government to examine to what extent the benefits of increased fee-structure have passed on to teachers and, particularly, to retired employees.
 
A division bench consisting of judges SC Dharmadhikari and MT Joshi issued the directives while hearing a petition filed by retired principal Baban Narad seeking implementation of the recommendations of fifth and sixth pay commissions by his employer Shivaji Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and its unaided college NS Ganguwar College of Education, Gadchiroli.
 
The judges have asked the government to find out if there are any lapses in the implementation and to inform them what action it intends to take against the defaulting institutions. The court has also instructed the government to direct the state higher education secretary to treat the petition as illustration and steps within three months from the date of this order.
 
The court has also stated that if any amount is payable to the petitioner by his employer and its management, the secretary should issue appropriate orders and ensure that the petitioner gets his dues in accordance with the two panels' recommendations.
 
DN Mathur appeared for the petitioner, while VN Morande (employer-institution) and Ambareesh Joshi (state) represented the respondents.

Source | Times of India | 7 August 2012

Views: 74

Reply to This

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop