Latest Activity

GAURAV BHUSAN ARYA shared a profile on Facebook
Saturday
Bidyut Bikash Kalita posted a blog post
Saturday
Profile IconDhanu shri, Kumari Ankita, Arunima Giri and 2 more joined LIS Links
Saturday
Dr. Badan Barman posted a discussion
Saturday
Abhishek Chourasiya updated their profile
Thursday
Profile IconSweety Angelirie Kharumnuid and Alka Solanki joined LIS Links
Wednesday
Dr. SUDHI S VIJAYAN posted an event
Wednesday
A.Mahesh left a comment for Dr. Badan Barman
Feb 9
Dr. N K Pachauri posted a discussion
Feb 9
A.Mahesh posted a blog post
Feb 9
Profile IconKatie Rodgerson, Swapna Khandekar, Ajay parmar and 9 more joined LIS Links
Feb 9
Kirtisharma updated their profile
Feb 6
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
Feb 5
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted events
Feb 5
Abhishek Pingale updated their profile
Feb 5
Noor Aziz and Dr. Badan Barman are now friends
Feb 5
Profile IconAman Pathe, Dhritima Kakati, Dr. Priyanka Suryavanshi and 3 more joined LIS Links
Feb 4
Devendra Singh Kotal updated their profile
Feb 4
Profile IconDevendra Singh Kotal, MANI THALAPATHI, Sanjeev Kumar and 2 more joined LIS Links
Feb 3
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted events
Feb 3

Act against defaulting institutions: Bombay HC to govt

NAGPUR: The Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court has directed the Maharashtra government to examine to what extent the benefits of increased fee-structure have passed on to teachers and, particularly, to retired employees.
 
A division bench consisting of judges SC Dharmadhikari and MT Joshi issued the directives while hearing a petition filed by retired principal Baban Narad seeking implementation of the recommendations of fifth and sixth pay commissions by his employer Shivaji Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and its unaided college NS Ganguwar College of Education, Gadchiroli.
 
The judges have asked the government to find out if there are any lapses in the implementation and to inform them what action it intends to take against the defaulting institutions. The court has also instructed the government to direct the state higher education secretary to treat the petition as illustration and steps within three months from the date of this order.
 
The court has also stated that if any amount is payable to the petitioner by his employer and its management, the secretary should issue appropriate orders and ensure that the petitioner gets his dues in accordance with the two panels' recommendations.
 
DN Mathur appeared for the petitioner, while VN Morande (employer-institution) and Ambareesh Joshi (state) represented the respondents.

Source | Times of India | 7 August 2012

Views: 75

Reply to This

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp