Invitation to Present | SoFerence 2026: A Global Platform to Showcase AI Use Cases in Libraries at Virtual
September 10, 2026 from 9:30am to 5pm
LIS Links
First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India
LIS Links Becoming More Social
Birthdays
Birthdays Today
Latest Activity
Call for Paper for Libra World: The International Journal of Library and Information Technology (ISSN: 3139-1133) at online
August 1, 2026 at 6pm to August 20, 2026 at 7pm
Online Session on "Introduction to Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), Patent, Designs Filing
August 5, 2026 from 11am to 12pm5 days Librarian Development Program: Empowering Librarians for the Digital Future
August 10, 2026 at 3pm to August 14, 2026 at 4pm
Difference between faceted and enumerative classifications
Dear Forum Members,
Please differentiate faceted classification from enumerative classifications.
Which classification schemes are tailor made schemes?
Kindly explain in easy way with examples
Tthanks in advance.
Views: 13558
Replies to This Forum
-
Permalink Reply by Manoj Kumar Khator on
-
enumerative classifications enumeration is normally achieved by first identifying the main disciplines to be covered by the scheme, either on a philosophical or pragmatic basis, and allocating each a main class. Then each discipline is divided into subclasses. This process of subdivision is continued until an appropriate level of specificity has been achieved. The object is to provide one place, and one place only, for each subject.
For example, the DDC classifies "Philosophy and Psychology" as class 100, which is further broken down into 100: Philosophy, 110: Metaphysics, 120: Epistemology, etc. Many enumerative schemes are thus also hierarchical.
Enumerative classifications are essentially top-down methods of analysis: you start at the top of the hierarchy and work your way down until you find a suitable heading or term that describes or classifies your text.faceted classification arose from the need to accommodate complex or multi-concept subjects. Jennifer E. Rowley, in her book Organizing Knowledge, notes that what Ranganathan recognized was that the world of knowledge was growing quickly, with new areas of knowledge being discovered and new ways to combine existing subjects. He understood that any classification that attempted to enumerate a finite number of subjects without full capabilities for expansion to allow for new areas of knowledge could never meet the needs of the future.
-
Permalink Reply by Qalandar Baba on
-
Thanks dear sir..
© 2026 Created by Dr. Badan Barman.
Powered by
