LIS Links
First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India
LIS Links Becoming More Social
Birthdays
Birthdays Today
Latest Activity
7 Days Faculty Development Programme (FDP) on AI IN EDUCATION AND RESEARCH at Assam
From Library Automation to Digital Repositories: A 5-Day Hands-on Workshop on Koha & DSpace for LIS Professionals at Online
Librarianship in the AI Era: A 5-Day Practical Skill Development Programme at Online
One-Day National Seminar on Artificial Intelligence and Academic Libraries: Issues and Opportunities in the 21st Century at kongu arts and science college
Two-Day Online National Workshop on Library Automation Using Koha at Cooch Behar, West Bengal
Top Content
Difference between faceted and enumerative classifications
Dear Forum Members,
Please differentiate faceted classification from enumerative classifications.
Which classification schemes are tailor made schemes?
Kindly explain in easy way with examples
Tthanks in advance.
Views: 13582
Replies to This Forum
-
Permalink Reply by Manoj Kumar Khator on
-
enumerative classifications enumeration is normally achieved by first identifying the main disciplines to be covered by the scheme, either on a philosophical or pragmatic basis, and allocating each a main class. Then each discipline is divided into subclasses. This process of subdivision is continued until an appropriate level of specificity has been achieved. The object is to provide one place, and one place only, for each subject.
For example, the DDC classifies "Philosophy and Psychology" as class 100, which is further broken down into 100: Philosophy, 110: Metaphysics, 120: Epistemology, etc. Many enumerative schemes are thus also hierarchical.
Enumerative classifications are essentially top-down methods of analysis: you start at the top of the hierarchy and work your way down until you find a suitable heading or term that describes or classifies your text.faceted classification arose from the need to accommodate complex or multi-concept subjects. Jennifer E. Rowley, in her book Organizing Knowledge, notes that what Ranganathan recognized was that the world of knowledge was growing quickly, with new areas of knowledge being discovered and new ways to combine existing subjects. He understood that any classification that attempted to enumerate a finite number of subjects without full capabilities for expansion to allow for new areas of knowledge could never meet the needs of the future.
-
Permalink Reply by Qalandar Baba on
-
Thanks dear sir..
© 2026 Created by Dr. Badan Barman.
Powered by
