LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

DEVI SHANKAR DINGARA updated their profile
20 hours ago
ASHUTOSH KAG updated their profile
yesterday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted discussions
yesterday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
yesterday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN is now friends with Ramesh Kumar and Suraj Morya
yesterday
Archanagita Saikia posted a discussion
yesterday
Manju Meerwal joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
yesterday
Dr. O Seshaiaih posted a discussion
yesterday
Dr. A. Madhava Rao posted an event

Online-Lecture on "AI Tools for Academic Research Writing and Publishing" at Microsoft Teams (Online)

August 4, 2025 from 2pm to 4pm
yesterday
Dr. Badan Barman posted a blog post
yesterday
MANJEET KHATRI posted a blog post
yesterday
Profile IconRadhika J, Mohan, RP Raaj and 36 more joined LIS Links
yesterday
MANJEET KHATRI updated their profile
Wednesday
DEVI SHANKAR DINGARA shared a profile on Facebook
Tuesday
Dr.Stephen.G replied to Dr.Stephen.G's discussion Call for Papers – ICDIASLS-2025
Sunday
Dr.Stephen.G posted a discussion
Sunday
CHETAN RAVAL updated their profile
Jul 11
Bilal Rabbani is now friends with Millan Krushna Dutta and Mhuammad Rafiq Akhtar
Jul 10
Vinod Kumar Jain posted a blog post
Jul 9
neema shukla posted an event
Thumbnail

International Conference on Libraries and Emerging Technologies for Smart Knowledge Ecosystems (ICLET 2025), at Jaipur,Rajasthan

November 14, 2025 at 9am to November 15, 2025 at 6pm
Jul 9

Is There Any Grammatical Mistake in Dr. Ranganatha's Five Law of Library Science

Many Lecturer says that there are grammatical mistake in the 2nd & 3rd Law of Library Science..

Every Reader his/her Book

Every Book It's Reader

The above statement doesn't make any sense. Please guide me, Is this really so and How Dr. Ranganathan can do such mistake

Views: 757

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Dear Atul

If you or your lecturers feel there is a grammatical mistake in the above laws enunciated by Dr. SRR then what according to you or your lecturers should be the right version?

If we know that then we will be able to debate freely on the issue.

I feel the laws stated above are right.  Superfluous words have been eliminated and law of parsimony,I guess, has been applied.

Thanku so much for your Reply...

Lecturer says that

3rd & 4th law should be

Every Reader has his /her Book

Every book has its Reader.

I toldthem that it is law and law should be free of grammar and unwanted word

Dear sir,

Dr. Rangnathan is considered to be the father of library science, documentation, and information science in India. So we should understand that father can't make mistakes, instead children sometimes misinterpret the father.

One can say there are grammatical mistakes, If you write these laws without commas,

          2nd law:-   "Every reader his [or her] book."

          3rd law:-    "Every book its reader."

You may find it perfectly fine if they are written with commas;

          2nd law:-  "Every reader ,  his [or her] book."

          3rd law:-   "Every book ,  its reader."

There is no need to use any prepositions or verbs in this laws for grammatical corrections. It is worth to understand the meaning of these laws instead of criticizing Dr. Rangnathan.

Regards

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop