Two Days National Conference on Role of Libraries and Institutions in Research and Publication Ethics at Nanded, Maharashtra
December 19, 2025 to December 20, 2025
LIS Links
First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India
LIS Links Becoming More Social
Birthdays
Birthdays Today
Latest Activity
Two-Days National Conference on Research Libraries: A Source to Adapt to Digital Form Using the Indian Knowledge Systems (IKS) in Promoting Social Science Research (NIKS-DR 2026) at Himachal Pradesh - Baddi , Soalan
February 27, 2026 to February 28, 2026
One Day National Seminar on Emerging Technologies and Future Libraries at Venue: 1st Floor, Training Hall, Academic Block, NITHM Campus, Gachibowli, Hyderabad – 500032 www.nithm.ac.in
December 7, 2025 all day
International Conference on Transforming Libraries: Innovation, Management, Smart Technologies and Creative Knowledge of Society for the Future at Hybrid Mode (Offline and Online)
December 12, 2025 at 9am to December 13, 2025 at 6pm
ICAL 2026: International Conference on Asian Libraries on Evolving Information Landscape: Making Libraries Future-Ready at IIM, Kashipur, Uttarakhand
April 16, 2026 at 9am to April 18, 2026 at 5pm
ICAL 2026: International Conference on Asian Libraries on Evolving Information Landscape: Making Libraries Future-Ready at IIM, Kashipur, Uttarakhand
April 16, 2026 at 9am to April 18, 2026 at 5pm
Is There Any Grammatical Mistake in Dr. Ranganatha's Five Law of Library Science
Many Lecturer says that there are grammatical mistake in the 2nd & 3rd Law of Library Science..
Every Reader his/her Book
Every Book It's Reader
The above statement doesn't make any sense. Please guide me, Is this really so and How Dr. Ranganathan can do such mistake
Views: 791
Replies to This Forum
-
Permalink Reply by Siddu on
-
Dear Atul
If you or your lecturers feel there is a grammatical mistake in the above laws enunciated by Dr. SRR then what according to you or your lecturers should be the right version?
If we know that then we will be able to debate freely on the issue.
I feel the laws stated above are right. Superfluous words have been eliminated and law of parsimony,I guess, has been applied.
-
Permalink Reply by Atul R. Sidurkar on
-
Thanku so much for your Reply...
Lecturer says that
3rd & 4th law should be
Every Reader has his /her Book
Every book has its Reader.
I toldthem that it is law and law should be free of grammar and unwanted word
-
Permalink Reply by Jignesh C. Parmar on
-
Dear sir,
Dr. Rangnathan is considered to be the father of library science, documentation, and information science in India. So we should understand that father can't make mistakes, instead children sometimes misinterpret the father.
One can say there are grammatical mistakes, If you write these laws without commas,
2nd law:- "Every reader his [or her] book."
3rd law:- "Every book its reader."
You may find it perfectly fine if they are written with commas;
2nd law:- "Every reader , his [or her] book."
3rd law:- "Every book , its reader."
There is no need to use any prepositions or verbs in this laws for grammatical corrections. It is worth to understand the meaning of these laws instead of criticizing Dr. Rangnathan.
Regards
© 2025 Created by Dr. Badan Barman.
Powered by
