Latest Activity

Dr. Bhakti Gala and Geetanjali Tiwari are now friends
7 hours ago
Manashi Devi is now a member of LIS Links
9 hours ago
Profile IconPallavi Sushant Sapkal, Gorti kartik mahadev and shrddha thomare joined LIS Links
yesterday
Profile IconShubham Verma, Ranjit Das, Adari P N Lalitha Devi and 1 more joined LIS Links
Monday
Surendra Singh is attending Dr. Ashis Biswas's event
Saturday
Dr. Ashis Biswas posted an event
Saturday
Profile IconAbhishek shriyal and AMAN SAHU joined LIS Links
Saturday
Pssprakasarao updated their profile
Nov 21
Profile IconSwati Malvi, S.Francis Selvaraj and Siva M joined LIS Links
Nov 19
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a blog post
Nov 18
Dr.Stephen.G was featured
Nov 18
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
Nov 18
Surendra Singh left a comment for Arnica Kumari
Nov 18
Profile IconAyushi kushwaha, Shyamghan Nayak, Raja Rajeshwari G and 1 more joined LIS Links
Nov 17
Profile IconRamachandran K, KASTHURI PRIYA, Ashutosh Panigrahi and 1 more joined LIS Links
Nov 16
Dr. T. Raja updated their profile
Nov 16
N.Harilakshmi posted a discussion
Nov 16
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
Nov 14
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted discussions
Nov 14
Dr. Ashis Biswas posted events
Nov 14

Can we consider primary sources always authentic?

Can we consider primary sources authentic source of Information?

Views: 365

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Dear Ms. Namrata Joshi,

Thanks for your post and addressing quite a complex issue.

In one way, the primary sources, as, say, articles in periodicals or Conference Proceedings,

where the original works are generally presented/reported for the first time by person(s) originally created it. In this sense it can be regarded to be authentic. By the way, I am using the word Authentic to mean its accuracy or that the reportage is Perfect or correct

However, it can always happen (& quite naturally, especially for experimental research) that the process/technique/formulation etc. etc.during experimentation (&/or analysis) might be faulty or erroneous. As such, as you can easily understand the inference or the reportage itself should be erroneous!! As such, it was not not authentic in the sense that it is not correct!! In many Scientific Research such first reports were later found to be incorrect!!

So it implies that answer to your query can be answered as YES & NO at the same time!!

Sincerely,

Siddhartha Shankar Ray

thanks for reply sir!

I am still confused ,because i am totally agree with the information in given link

http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/education/008-3010-e.html

please see the link.

 

Your question is bit amusing!.  It is like asking someone - can truth be trusted or believed not be lie!!?

Primary sources are the original sources. They provide first-hand testimony or direct evidence concerning a topic under investigation. They are created by witnesses or recorders who experienced the events or conditions being documented. Often these sources are created at the time when the events or conditions are occurring.  Primary sources can include autobiographies, memoirs,manuscripts, tablets, stone inscriptions, coins etc. that leads to  information of some form for that matter.

These sources have to be authentic always.  No one can question or dispute this.

Dear sir!

thks for your reply but please see the link below,

http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/education/008-3010-e.html

thank you!

You should have then made the context of your question very clear to  everybody to elicit specific answers from them!

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp