Latest Activity

Kanika sharma and Ankit Jaiswal are now friends
10 hours ago
Nagendra N updated their profile
Thursday
Pallavi Sushant Sapkal and S. Jaffer Basha are now friends
Monday
Dr. Divyanshu Gupta updated their profile
Mar 20
Nilesh and Dr. Badan Barman are now friends
Mar 19
Dr. Gulshan Kumar Sachdeva updated their profile
Mar 17
Dr. Gulshan Kumar Sachdeva and sandeep shukla are now friends
Mar 17
Devendra Parker joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Mar 17
Manoj Kumar updated their profile
Mar 15
Ranjansen Shende updated their profile
Mar 15
Ku. Dipti Lodwal joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Mar 13
Ku. Dipti Lodwal joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Mar 13
Ku. Dipti Lodwal left a comment for Arun kumar Sirla
Mar 13
Ku. Dipti Lodwal left a comment for Vikrant Dubey
Mar 13
Ku. Dipti Lodwal posted a status
Mar 13
Ku. Dipti Lodwal commented on Ku. Dipti Lodwal's event 'Two Days International Seminar'
Mar 12
sangeeta sharma is attending Dr. Ashis Biswas's event
Mar 11
sangeeta sharma commented on Ku. Dipti Lodwal's event 'Two Days International Seminar'
Mar 11
sangeeta sharma updated their profile
Mar 11
sangeeta sharma is attending Ku. Dipti Lodwal's event
Thumbnail

Two Days International Seminar at Government Law College Ujjain (Madhya Pradesh)

March 28, 2026 at 10:30am to March 29, 2026 at 5:30pm
Mar 10

Can we consider primary sources always authentic?

Can we consider primary sources authentic source of Information?

Views: 396

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Dear Ms. Namrata Joshi,

Thanks for your post and addressing quite a complex issue.

In one way, the primary sources, as, say, articles in periodicals or Conference Proceedings,

where the original works are generally presented/reported for the first time by person(s) originally created it. In this sense it can be regarded to be authentic. By the way, I am using the word Authentic to mean its accuracy or that the reportage is Perfect or correct

However, it can always happen (& quite naturally, especially for experimental research) that the process/technique/formulation etc. etc.during experimentation (&/or analysis) might be faulty or erroneous. As such, as you can easily understand the inference or the reportage itself should be erroneous!! As such, it was not not authentic in the sense that it is not correct!! In many Scientific Research such first reports were later found to be incorrect!!

So it implies that answer to your query can be answered as YES & NO at the same time!!

Sincerely,

Siddhartha Shankar Ray

thanks for reply sir!

I am still confused ,because i am totally agree with the information in given link

http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/education/008-3010-e.html

please see the link.

 

Your question is bit amusing!.  It is like asking someone - can truth be trusted or believed not be lie!!?

Primary sources are the original sources. They provide first-hand testimony or direct evidence concerning a topic under investigation. They are created by witnesses or recorders who experienced the events or conditions being documented. Often these sources are created at the time when the events or conditions are occurring.  Primary sources can include autobiographies, memoirs,manuscripts, tablets, stone inscriptions, coins etc. that leads to  information of some form for that matter.

These sources have to be authentic always.  No one can question or dispute this.

Dear sir!

thks for your reply but please see the link below,

http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/education/008-3010-e.html

thank you!

You should have then made the context of your question very clear to  everybody to elicit specific answers from them!

RSS

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp