Latest Activity

Chanlang ki Bareh updated their profile
1 hour ago
Punjab singh and Dr. Badan Barman are now friends
1 hour ago
sri maya sugasini updated their profile
3 hours ago
ALTAF ALI updated their profile
3 hours ago
Chetna Khera updated their profile
4 hours ago
Chetna Khera might attend Sunita Pareek's event
4 hours ago
Dr Sudhir Kumar Jena updated their profile
5 hours ago
ANJAN KUMAR VERMA updated their profile
5 hours ago
Ishan Jaydev Varma updated their profile
5 hours ago
Ishan Jaydev Varma and priyanka vyas are now friends
5 hours ago
SUMIT KUMAR GUPTA updated their profile
7 hours ago
pranjali lele updated their profile
8 hours ago
Vishwa Naikar updated their profile
21 hours ago
Preeti Sharda updated their profile
yesterday
1994 updated their profile
yesterday
vijayakumar.m updated their profile
Saturday
VINOD D updated their profile
Saturday
ASIF ALI updated their profile
Saturday
Manjunath Dodamani updated their profile
Saturday
CHANDRAN VELMURUGAN is now friends with Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN and BMS PUBLISHING HOUSE
Saturday

Can we consider primary sources always authentic?

Can we consider primary sources authentic source of Information?

Views: 428

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Dear Ms. Namrata Joshi,

Thanks for your post and addressing quite a complex issue.

In one way, the primary sources, as, say, articles in periodicals or Conference Proceedings,

where the original works are generally presented/reported for the first time by person(s) originally created it. In this sense it can be regarded to be authentic. By the way, I am using the word Authentic to mean its accuracy or that the reportage is Perfect or correct

However, it can always happen (& quite naturally, especially for experimental research) that the process/technique/formulation etc. etc.during experimentation (&/or analysis) might be faulty or erroneous. As such, as you can easily understand the inference or the reportage itself should be erroneous!! As such, it was not not authentic in the sense that it is not correct!! In many Scientific Research such first reports were later found to be incorrect!!

So it implies that answer to your query can be answered as YES & NO at the same time!!

Sincerely,

Siddhartha Shankar Ray

thanks for reply sir!

I am still confused ,because i am totally agree with the information in given link

http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/education/008-3010-e.html

please see the link.

 

Your question is bit amusing!.  It is like asking someone - can truth be trusted or believed not be lie!!?

Primary sources are the original sources. They provide first-hand testimony or direct evidence concerning a topic under investigation. They are created by witnesses or recorders who experienced the events or conditions being documented. Often these sources are created at the time when the events or conditions are occurring.  Primary sources can include autobiographies, memoirs,manuscripts, tablets, stone inscriptions, coins etc. that leads to  information of some form for that matter.

These sources have to be authentic always.  No one can question or dispute this.

Dear sir!

thks for your reply but please see the link below,

http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/education/008-3010-e.html

thank you!

You should have then made the context of your question very clear to  everybody to elicit specific answers from them!

RSS

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp