UGC NET Guide Book
Advertise your business here

Subscribe to LIS Links Digest: Its free!

LIS Links Email Subscription LIS Links Google Plus Page Follow LIS Links Facebook Page Like LIS Links Twitter Follow LIS Links RSS Feed Subscription

Latest Activity


West Bengal
Siddhartha Shankar Ray replied to Ajit P's discussion Stress; Burnout; Technostress and Libraries
49 minutes ago

Kerala
Baiju Joy replied to Kasivisalakshi M's discussion How to tackle students
5 hours ago

Uttar Pradesh
Dr. N. K. Pachauri replied to Shweta Patil's discussion Need help to calculate Chi Square Test for Volume Vs No of Publication
6 hours ago

Delhi
Mushtaq Ahmad liked Dr. N. K. Pachauri's blog post Library Assistant and Library Attendant recruitment in NIT Srinagar, Kashmir
6 hours ago

Gujarat
SADHU PADMANABHAKUMAR NANAKDASJI commented on Priya's photo
7 hours ago

Karnataka
Mrs shazad afia posted a status
"HAPPY DIWALI TO ALL LIBRARY PROFESSIONALS"
7 hours ago

Goa
Munesh Kumar and Ananda Ramesh A are now friends
7 hours ago

Andhra Pradesh
Snehashish Dash updated their profile
8 hours ago

Karnataka
Shweta Patil replied to Shweta Patil's discussion Need help to calculate Chi Square Test for Volume Vs No of Publication
8 hours ago

Pondicherry
Ananda Ramesh A liked Ajit P's discussion Stress; Burnout; Technostress and Libraries
9 hours ago

Kerala
Vishnumaya RS is now friends with pankaj soni, Hanumamatha, Arun Joseph. S and Arun prabhu, C
9 hours ago

Foreigner
Dr Gopakumar replied to Shweta Patil's discussion Need help to calculate Chi Square Test for Volume Vs No of Publication
9 hours ago

West Bengal
Biplab Chanda liked Reshmi Sarkar's discussion CBSE / UGC NET/SET related questions
9 hours ago

Uttar Pradesh
Vipin Panday liked Vipin Panday's discussion BLIS from IGNOU in PPN College Kanpur
10 hours ago

Lakshadweep
Hakeem K.K replied to Reshmi Sarkar's discussion UGC NET / CBSE NET Study Materials
10 hours ago

West Bengal
SOUMEN GHOSH and Badan Barman are now friends
11 hours ago

 NET JUNE 2012

 WILL THE KERALA COURT DECISION BE VALID FOR ALL SUCH CANDIDATES ALL OVER INDIA?

IT SHOULD BE SO UNIVERSALLY FOR ALL .

THOSE CANDITATES WHO HAD SCORED THE MINIMUM QUALIFYING MARKS AS WAS DECLARED BY UGC BEFORE THE CHANGE IN THE QUALIFYING CRITERIA MUST UNITE.

HOW?

I AM BALARAM FROM KOLKATA.

 

Views: 2093

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Yes, we should fight jointly. I think we must PIL instead of file petitions in states.

PIL???

contact me. with mail.

No need to file writ petition. Bc.... 

 

SC relief to NET candidates

PUNE: In a relief to thousands of aspirants taking the national eligibility test (NET), the UGC has withdrawn its decision to increase the cut-off marks for clearing the NET, following a Supreme Court order on Friday. The UGC had increased the eligibility score by 15% without notice.

The national educational testing bureau of the UGC conducts the NET for determining the eligibility for lectureship and for awarding junior research fellowship to ensure minimum standards for the entrants in the teaching profession and research. The NET is conducted in June and December every year.

The UGC, however, made several changes in the June 2012 exam, including increasing the cut-off marks. The candidates learnt about the changes only when the UGC announced it a day after announcing the results of the exam on September 18.

As per the initial notification, candidates belonging to the SC/ST sections needed 35, 35, and 60 marks respectively for qualifying papers 1, 2 and 3. The marks to be obtained by the OBCs were set as 35, 35, and 68 and for those belonging to the general category it was 40, 40, and 75. But, when the results were announced, candidates who would've been eligible as per the initial criteria failed to qualify.

As per the new criteria, the percentage of marks to be scored by candidates belonging to different categories has been increased by 15%.

This made several students file an affidavit with the SC against the UGC regarding change in norms. On Friday, the SC issued an order saying that the UGC's decision was invalid as it did not follow the exam policy in announcing the changes in cut-offs and that, too, in such a short period of time. An official at the University of Pune that conducts the NET exam said, "The SC decision is valid for all candidates who sat for the June 2012 examinations. The old cut-offs will be considered and new results will be announced."

 

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/education/entrance-exams/SC...

RSS

© 2014   Created by Badan Barman.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...