Replies to This Forum

Permalink Reply by Dr.L.M.Khan on November 11, 2012 at 22:38

ugc make fool of net applicant again and again.

Please every one protest against ugc. 

no one apply net exam 

they earn money and make fool of applicant.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ravish Verma on November 13, 2012 at 22:12

62 % also.........

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Shubu d on November 12, 2012 at 0:51

Injustice continues.. I just asked to re-total my marks for paper-I but still they didn't considered me.. so finally now I am open to move to the court..

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Pravin Umraoji Wasu on November 12, 2012 at 1:14

I am affected candidate (54% in obc cat). This ugc decision (supplementary result) is not suitable to net applicant. Most of the net applicant belong to middle class family so financially not strong. They facing many problem like exam fee problem, age problem, Time problem, so many problem facing. My humble request to ugc please declarer there final passing criteria about forthcoming net exam and i request to all the affected net candidates don't worry and we are fight again ugc, human resource ministry of India (who work about human resource development and provide skill human resource to govt.) So today i am decide go to ramleela maydan and meet Mr. Arvind kejriwal. Because most of the candidate belong to middle class family. ugc is not doing job well, because net exam is eligibility test not competitive exam who provide job.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Srinivas Garimella on November 12, 2012 at 4:47

Please don't WASTE the time of the TRUE INDIAN, Shri ARAVIND KEJRIWAL whom the Nation Loves. Thank you.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ashok Bhatt on November 12, 2012 at 17:26

UGC SHOULD HAVE A FIX CRITERIA FOR QUALIFYING THE NET EXAM, WHETHER IT IS 65%, 70% or 75%, No FLUCTUATION SHOULD BE THERE.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mrutyunjay Sethy on November 12, 2012 at 21:50

its ok but ugc must fixed criteria ,otherwise onday who got 75% may not get ugc net because of hiding of cutoff mark

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by MUKUL AGARWAL on November 13, 2012 at 1:29

Wishing a very happy Deepawali to all of the professionals .......of course UGC must be clear in its policy for NET qualifying criteria.......once decided it should be strict on this criteria.....no supplementary result is needed......otherwise it will follow the same story of UPTET  2011

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by SONTENI SRINIVAS on November 13, 2012 at 19:42

again UGC cheated all the UGC-NET aspirants. i am also again cheated by UGC, because I secured more than 58% of marks in 2012 june. i am OBC candidate. But  I am not qualified in supplementary results also.

please give me any suggestion, and what I can do now.

 

03590099

59

SONTENI SRINIVAS

62.00%

64.00%

53.33%

58.86%

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by SIMHACHALAM TERLI on November 14, 2012 at 2:34

Dear Friends Come and unite for justice  

 

To

The Chairman

University Grants Commission

New Delhi – 110 002

 

 

Respected Sir,

 

Sub:     Regarding injustice in the Supplementary result of UGC NET June, 2012 released on 12^th Nov, 2012 by UGC NET Bureau

Ref:                

It is to bring to your kind notice that the supplementary to UGC NET June 2012 result realized on 18^th Sep, 2012 realized on 12^th Nov, 2012 the following errors has been observed:

1. It bring to your notice that, the committee reduced about 2% of marks in total (from 65% to 63 %) is considered (the general category candidates passed those who got 64% and 63%) in favour of Open Category Candidates but in view of OBC/ST/ST/PHC is not considered to reduced as per the General Category (2% was not reduced 60% to 58%). It looks injustice to the reserved categories.
2. Bring to your notice that the committee has not followed uniform parameters for cut off marks/percentage on all subjects which are in UGC-NET June, 2012.
3. It also bring to your kind notice that the person who got 39.88% passed in the supplementary result  but a person who got 58.29 not passed in the same supplementary result this shows injustice to the candidates.
4. It also further bring to your notice that some persons who got 56 marks in Paper – I of UGC NET June, 2012 according to the key released by UGC NET Bureau but in the same paper the person got 46 marks according to Marks list released by UGC NET this also put before the notice of the committee before the meeting held on 22^nd Oct, 2012 and later but no rectifications were found. 

Copy to

Chairman, UGC

Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India.

Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Govt. of India

      

• ▶ Reply