Replies to This Forum

Permalink Reply by Mrutyunjay Sethy on November 13, 2012 at 5:41

i think the same

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by X on November 13, 2012 at 6:43

code 87 is for Computer Science. And very few people can score marks above 60% in computer science. This sub is not as easy as management, Sociology, Library Science. I think new criteria is applied for this subject so that sufficient number of candidates could be qualified.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Pandey,Virendra Kumar on November 13, 2012 at 17:28

Ye to UGC ka samuhik bahiskar karna chahiye ye kaisi body yaha kya kam ho raha hai kya sab chor,corrupt hi hai kya itna paisa lekar bhi sahi result nahi de pa rahi hai .Ye log UGC committee,board faltu hai sab decision lete hai koi kam nahi karta hai kaun kaun kitna number paya hai use NET qualify to kar dena chahiye jo minimum eligbility criteria pass karta hai apni bat ko rakhne ke liye fir se vo ek aggregate criteria bana dali to minimum criteria ka kya matlab hai.mai to bolta hu bhai NET ka exam dena hi band karo school me job karo NET ki jarurat hi nahi hai .

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by gkarunakar2007 on November 13, 2012 at 17:43

thank u for sharing this information . but we are helpless . we have no money no power

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by SIMHACHALAM TERLI on November 14, 2012 at 2:33

Dear Friends, 

those who got above 58% in OBC and 53 in SC/ST/PHC come forward for justice in the net result 

 

 

To

The Chairman

University Grants Commission

New Delhi – 110 002

 

 

Respected Sir,

 

Sub:     Regarding injustice in the Supplementary result of UGC NET June, 2012 released on 12^th Nov, 2012 by UGC NET Bureau

Ref:                

It is to bring to your kind notice that the supplementary to UGC NET June 2012 result realized on 18^th Sep, 2012 realized on 12^th Nov, 2012 the following errors has been observed:

1. It bring to your notice that, the committee reduced about 2% of marks in total (from 65% to 63 %) is considered (the general category candidates passed those who got 64% and 63%) in favour of Open Category Candidates but in view of OBC/ST/ST/PHC is not considered to reduced as per the General Category (2% was not reduced 60% to 58%). It looks injustice to the reserved categories.
2. Bring to your notice that the committee has not followed uniform parameters for cut off marks/percentage on all subjects which are in UGC-NET June, 2012.
3. It also bring to your kind notice that the person who got 39.88% passed in the supplementary result  but a person who got 58.29 not passed in the same supplementary result this shows injustice to the candidates.
4. It also further bring to your notice that some persons who got 56 marks in Paper – I of UGC NET June, 2012 according to the key released by UGC NET Bureau but in the same paper the person got 46 marks according to Marks list released by UGC NET this also put before the notice of the committee before the meeting held on 22^nd Oct, 2012 and later but no rectifications were found. 

Copy to

Chairman, UGC

Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India.

Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Govt. of India

      

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by zaidy on November 14, 2012 at 4:11

Wow... i know some of the candidates who have qualify supplementary result of UGC NET June 2012 examination in Computer Science and application and they are not able to teach atleast MS WORD Package  and they are able to Assistant professor. INDIA ME SAB KUCH POSSIBLE HAI, UGC NE NET KA KABADA NIKAL DIYA.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Manmeet Kaur on November 15, 2012 at 0:23

hello

to all

when we all are same made by God

then wot is the difference in these all categories

and if somebody has talent then nobody can see that beside himself or herself

its a very good decision made by UGC

that they have seen the candidates who are more talented and have to clear in net

and thats y they did this.......

noboday has the right to say anything against the anyone

all the persons has same right...........

if the second result is not good then i said the first result was also bad

like that result made all of us very frustrated

Jome Jose Sir i really salute to u

keep it up

u will definitely win

God and we all are with u alwz

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Manmeet Kaur on November 15, 2012 at 0:25

@rc singh

if u were also in that result then it was good

M i right ???

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by gkarunakar2007 on November 15, 2012 at 0:51

you have to know the meaning of republic and REPUBLIC OF INDIA

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by SKumar on November 15, 2012 at 23:24

Dear Friends, keeping aside the controversies surrounding the cut-off marks in the supplementary result, I open the floor for a debate on the principle of equity followed in selecting candidates for lectureship. The question is: "Is it fair to have category-wise cut-off marks for deciding eligibility for lectureship?" My take is No. Why? My logic is the following: When the cut-off mark for general category is 65% and for reserved category is 50% (for example), then what it means is that a candidate from reserved category with 50% mark is competent enough to teach in a particular class but a student (from general category) with at least 65%marks will be that much competent to teach in that class! I feel its unfair. In any qualifying examination (be it school boards) the minimum pass percentage (30%!)  is same for everyone irrespective of reservation categories. And there is a logic behind this. So, in my view (personal), UGC should define an uniform cut-off mark irrespective reservation categories. In any case, seats are reserved in the teaching places for reserved categories. 

Second, I also feel that the cut-off marks should be different for each subject depending upon the difficulty of each subject and the  number of candidates applied etc. If necessary, UGC can move into a percentile based system.

Your views?

Warm regards,

Pradhan

• ▶ Reply