First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India
5 members
60 members
84 members
707 members
in supplementary results only open category persons qualified in net ,OBC &SC/ST persons are not qualified in net this too much wrong
Tags:
i think the same
code 87 is for Computer Science. And very few people can score marks above 60% in computer science. This sub is not as easy as management, Sociology, Library Science. I think new criteria is applied for this subject so that sufficient number of candidates could be qualified.
Ye to UGC ka samuhik bahiskar karna chahiye ye kaisi body yaha kya kam ho raha hai kya sab chor,corrupt hi hai kya itna paisa lekar bhi sahi result nahi de pa rahi hai .Ye log UGC committee,board faltu hai sab decision lete hai koi kam nahi karta hai kaun kaun kitna number paya hai use NET qualify to kar dena chahiye jo minimum eligbility criteria pass karta hai apni bat ko rakhne ke liye fir se vo ek aggregate criteria bana dali to minimum criteria ka kya matlab hai.mai to bolta hu bhai NET ka exam dena hi band karo school me job karo NET ki jarurat hi nahi hai .
thank u for sharing this information . but we are helpless . we have no money no power
Dear Friends,
those who got above 58% in OBC and 53 in SC/ST/PHC come forward for justice in the net result
To
The Chairman
University Grants Commission
New Delhi – 110 002
Respected Sir,
Sub: Regarding injustice in the Supplementary result of UGC NET June, 2012 released on 12th Nov, 2012 by UGC NET Bureau
Ref:
It is to bring to your kind notice that the supplementary to UGC NET June 2012 result realized on 18th Sep, 2012 realized on 12th Nov, 2012 the following errors has been observed:
Copy to
Chairman, UGC
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India.
Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Govt. of India
Wow... i know some of the candidates who have qualify supplementary result of UGC NET June 2012 examination in Computer Science and application and they are not able to teach atleast MS WORD Package and they are able to Assistant professor. INDIA ME SAB KUCH POSSIBLE HAI, UGC NE NET KA KABADA NIKAL DIYA.
hello
to all
when we all are same made by God
then wot is the difference in these all categories
and if somebody has talent then nobody can see that beside himself or herself
its a very good decision made by UGC
that they have seen the candidates who are more talented and have to clear in net
and thats y they did this.......
noboday has the right to say anything against the anyone
all the persons has same right...........
if the second result is not good then i said the first result was also bad
like that result made all of us very frustrated
Jome Jose Sir i really salute to u
keep it up
u will definitely win
God and we all are with u alwz
@rc singh
if u were also in that result then it was good
M i right ???
you have to know the meaning of republic and REPUBLIC OF INDIA
Dear Friends, keeping aside the controversies surrounding the cut-off marks in the supplementary result, I open the floor for a debate on the principle of equity followed in selecting candidates for lectureship. The question is: "Is it fair to have category-wise cut-off marks for deciding eligibility for lectureship?" My take is No. Why? My logic is the following: When the cut-off mark for general category is 65% and for reserved category is 50% (for example), then what it means is that a candidate from reserved category with 50% mark is competent enough to teach in a particular class but a student (from general category) with at least 65%marks will be that much competent to teach in that class! I feel its unfair. In any qualifying examination (be it school boards) the minimum pass percentage (30%!) is same for everyone irrespective of reservation categories. And there is a logic behind this. So, in my view (personal), UGC should define an uniform cut-off mark irrespective reservation categories. In any case, seats are reserved in the teaching places for reserved categories.
Second, I also feel that the cut-off marks should be different for each subject depending upon the difficulty of each subject and the number of candidates applied etc. If necessary, UGC can move into a percentile based system.
Your views?
Warm regards,
Pradhan
© 2024 Created by Dr. Badan Barman.
Powered by