LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

TN SET 2012 Result Clarification

Mail to Bharathiar University :-

As per your notification the minimum eligible criteria for a BC student is 35, 35, 68 for PAPER I, PAPER II, & PAPER III Respectively (Attached Screen shot below). Now the result has been published today & found that you have added a new UGC criteria of Qualifying 7% of candidates in respective subject this has been completely omitted in your notification. Is there any notification mentioned regarding this new criteria earlier ?... If any please provide ….

Iam also a student of SET Examination (Roll no 06140017 ) & got the minimum qualifying criteria( 42 , 58 , & 76 in paper I, paper II, & paper III resp. TOTAL – 176 ) as per your notification but didn’t got favorable result. & also

In Economic subject a student Roll no 07040001 got total of 172 But got passed ( Attached Screenshot ), how is this possible ? , The law is equal for all student or the law varies on the basis of Subject ? How is this favorable ?
I want clear clarification & passing criteria for individual subject

Earlier regarding this issue only the Kerala high court (WP ( c ) 22187 / 2012) & the Chennai high court (WP 33798 / 2012) has given a favorable decision towards students on the basis of your earlier notification (for BC student is 35, 35, 68 for PAPER I, PAPER II, & PAPER III Respectively) , (Attached Judgment copy & screenshot ) . Now you are treating students on your own criteria again . Is this a favorable decision ? Is there any Specification of new criteria (7%) before the commencement of Examination. ? Is all the students are availing different criteria for passing based on subject ?

I need a complete clarification regarding this. Because I think this is an unfavourable act towards student & students are got cheated on their result publication. SET are making new criteria only after the publication of result. If this is the case Please provide a clarification to us.

Regards
L.Michael

Views: 3760

Attachments:

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Permalink Reply by Perumal A on February 9, 2013 at 23:55

My dear friend Michael,

                         SET result is based on 7% criteria fixed by UGC in their June-2012 exam, as per my perception and view, we library professionals should aim high because there is a heavy competition in our field compare to other some subjects it is only around 150 who got more than 210 marks in LIS subject so as come in 7%. Some subjects need only 170 cut off to reach 7% limit and some needs more than 200 cut off, in our LIS field, even SC & ST have to score 60% it means 105 questions of 210 marks, so think positively and you will win in near NET, SET exam, that's what i followed when i failed in my NET 2012 exam by .14 (Point one four) marks and now i scored more than 70% and won my SET exam. It is not mammoth task only need little concentration and dedication because we all have good back round of subject knowledge. It is great job by Bharathidasan University.

                       I wish you everyone who won the SET exam and pray to the almighty god for more success in our field. Best wishes.      Have a nice day friend.

Permalink Reply by MICHAEL on February 10, 2013 at 21:55
I have suggested for fixing equal pass mark for all subjects.

& I just want a clarification why they are including the new criteria of 7% after publication of result. It should be before Examination & should be mentioned clearly on their first notification..

Its just my opinion...

Is there anyone who is against the result publication... Is anyone there who is going to sue a case against this notification?
Permalink Reply by chitra inbanathan on February 11, 2013 at 16:51

I too object the action of the set declaration of the results the criteria for qualifying is not mentioned earlier and I have a cut of 212 and I am declared not qualified I have got through all the three papers with the marks Paper I 64, paper II 64 paper III 84 I wish a supplementary results should be published again I will also join with those who sue a case against this result

Permalink Reply by sadacharam on February 16, 2013 at 18:15

i appreciate your comments

Permalink Reply by A.D.SELVARAJ on April 15, 2013 at 22:31

any court  news about TNSLET 2012  or any possibility of published the supplementary result  

RSS

© 2024   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop