Replies to This Forum

Permalink Reply by Dr. N K Pachauri on February 12, 2014 at 19:57

Yes sir all reputed library association should look into the matter .....................

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by PARDEEP RATTAN on February 13, 2014 at 4:28

Thanks for responding, Dr. Pachauri. Looking at the seriousness of the issues we should immediately make representations regarding our issues to MHRD/UGC because in the coming days , probably in first/second week of March we will see Code of Conduct in view of Lok Sabha Elections. Moreover this is the ripe time to exploit our political connections to resolve our matters at this crucial juncture.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jagjit singh on February 14, 2014 at 18:21

sir

kinldy forward this demand also.

Subject: Rectification in the UGC norms of API for College Librarian in Appendix III   

                Table VII in  the UGC guidelines dated 30.6.2010.

Sir,

            UGC issued guidelines on 30.6.2010 for the minimum point norms of the APIs for the promotion  of College Teachers, College  Director of Physical Education and College Librarian. Sir , there is a mistake in the above mentioned table in  category III Research and Academic contribution for promotion of College Librarian from stage 1 to stage 2, stage 2 to stage 3 and stage 3 to stage 4 as follows:

IV

Research and Academic Contribution (Category III) – Minimum Annual Score Required – to be assessed cumulatively

5/Year   (40 assessment period)

10/Year   (100 assessment period)

15/ Year   (90 assessment period)

 

Sir, the assessment period for promotion from stage 1 to stage 2 is minimum 4 year instead of 40/assessment period minimum score should have been 20/assessment period @ 5/year (as mentioned in case of corresponding College Teachers and College Director of Physical education). The assessment period for promotion from stage 2 to stage 3 is 5 year instead of 100/assessment period minimum score should have been 50/assessment period @ 10/year (as mentioned in case of corresponding College Teachers and College Director of Physical Education). Similarly the assessment period for promotion from stage 3 to stage 4 is 3 year instead of 90/assessment period minimum score should have been 45/assessment period @ 15/year.

            I hereby request you to forward my representation to UGC and get this printing mistake rectified at the earliest.

Thanking you                                                         

Attachments:

• promnotionofLibrarianinCollege.jpg, 2.8 MB
• PromotionofDPIinCollege.jpg, 3.3 MB
• PromotionofteacherinCollege.jpg, 3.1 MB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by PARDEEP RATTAN on February 15, 2014 at 1:25

Sir,

The anomaly brought out into the notice by you regarding college librarians in appendix vii of UGC Guidelines 2010 has already been taken up and represented by COLNI- Confedration of Librarians of North India and Punjab College Librarians'Association. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jagjit singh on February 16, 2014 at 18:47

sir

thanks for giving information

• ▶ Reply