Latest Activity

Dr. Saurabh Prajapati updated their profile
1 hour ago
Nagender Singh updated their profile
14 hours ago
Salauddeen khan posted blog posts
Wednesday
Sunita Pareek posted an event
Wednesday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN and Akshay Subhash Gadade are now friends
Tuesday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
Tuesday
Dr.Akash Kumar Singh replied to Yogesh Awasthi's discussion Admission Notice from G. F. College, Shahjahanpur, U.P.
Tuesday
Akshay Subhash Gadade shared a profile on Facebook
Jul 4
Bidyut Bikash Kalita updated their profile
Jul 4
Dr. Sheel Bhadra Yadav posted a discussion
Jul 3
chinnadurai.D posted a discussion
Jul 3
Dr. Shivangkumar Bhaskarbhai Mah updated their profile
Jul 1
Dr. Shivangkumar Bhaskarbhai Mah and Dr. Badan Barman are now friends
Jul 1
Krishna kumar yadav shared a profile on Facebook
Jul 1
Krishna kumar yadav updated their profile
Jul 1
B. Rymbai updated their profile
Jun 28
Sathishkumar and Vijay Kumar Pagidikathula are now friends
Jun 28
Nidhi kushwaha updated their profile
Jun 28
Bidyut Bikash Kalita posted a blog post
Jun 27
Evana Mukherjee updated their profile
Jun 24

Dear all,

I am of the opinion that the present pattern of UGC NET examination has several inherent basic flaws and is therefore not a better asssessment or filtration system.  It does not necessarily separate the wheat from the chaff.

Being an objective examination with no negative marking, the passing of the examination has become just a matter of chance and not necessarily that of intelligence. UGC has made  a mockery of such an important examination as NET. In trying to simplify the examination, it has only diluted the process wherein any Tom, Dick and Harry can aspire to clear the same. 

Earlier we had Descriptive pattern wherein - the ability of the students to express, analyse in depth and present the pros and cons of a topic, hold on to a argument, language and comprehension skills etc were tested.  The candidates were tested in a credible crucible.

All that has gone now.  Should we embrace such a system??

Views: 3748

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

U r absolutely incorrect.If u see the standard of questions in Net June then you find that without deep knowledge no one can cross this obstacle.Earlier NET was only for student who is expert in memorise the things not understand the matter,now the real champs will come to the dice.

I thing u try to understand these things.

i agree with Mr. R.K.

you are wrong Mr.Sarvesh. i am agree to RK

R.K. sir is right

u r right R.K. ji

R.K. sir is right

The persons whose are seen the current Jun 2012 question papers never raise these type of questions. I wonder that how can one tick answer in fluke. Each n every question in the exam make us to think more, not like descriptive answer. In description type, One can impress the valuation officer by their good handwriting, underline in side headings, diagrams charts tables etc., without core point answer for the particular question. Its not possible in objective type questions. Hope you will understand.

Dear Sarvesh

Discriptive pattern is for those who have great cramming power and who have good handwriting.

And the objective pattern is for those who possess indepth knowldge of subject and clear concept.

Now the evaluater canot favour a person having good handwriting. Also the evaluation is out of evaluaters ego and mood.

Dear Sarvesh ji,

The present pattern of NET exam is very good.

R K sir you are right I agree with you

Thanks

Digambar Bhaurao Waghmare

Dear Mr. Sarvesh
R u thinks if NET exam pattern is change like objective type of answer, all students will clear NET exam, than your thinking is wrong. If you check paper 3 is not easy all question not only library science. Its was used deep knowledge

If you know about I.P.S & I.A.S exam pattern is also like objective types.

I am also agree with Mr.R.K

RSS

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp