Latest Activity

Amar Rithe is now a member of LIS Links
16 hours ago
NAVEEN SATAPPANAVAR updated their profile
17 hours ago
Manjunatha N is attending Parthasarathivamanan.K's event
20 hours ago
Manjunatha N updated their profile
20 hours ago
Dr. Bhakti Gala posted a discussion
yesterday
Profile IconRupam Tamuli and Manashi Devi joined LIS Links
yesterday
Dr. Bhakti Gala and Geetanjali Tiwari are now friends
Thursday
Profile IconPallavi Sushant Sapkal, Gorti kartik mahadev and shrddha thomare joined LIS Links
Wednesday
Profile IconShubham Verma, Ranjit Das, Adari P N Lalitha Devi and 1 more joined LIS Links
Monday
Surendra Singh is attending Dr. Ashis Biswas's event
Nov 21
Dr. Ashis Biswas posted an event
Nov 21
Profile IconAbhishek shriyal and AMAN SAHU joined LIS Links
Nov 21
Pssprakasarao updated their profile
Nov 21
Profile IconSwati Malvi, S.Francis Selvaraj and Siva M joined LIS Links
Nov 19
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a blog post
Nov 18
Dr.Stephen.G was featured
Nov 18
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
Nov 18
Surendra Singh left a comment for Arnica Kumari
Nov 18
Profile IconAyushi kushwaha, Shyamghan Nayak, Raja Rajeshwari G and 1 more joined LIS Links
Nov 17
Profile IconRamachandran K, KASTHURI PRIYA, Ashutosh Panigrahi and 1 more joined LIS Links
Nov 16

Order Reserved on UGC’s Plea on UGC June, 2012 NET Examination

http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/order-reserved-on-...

A Division Bench of the Kerala High Court on Monday reserved its order on an appeal filed by the UGC against a single judge’s verdict quashing the new qualifying criteria prescribed by the UGC in the National Eligibility Test for lectureships.

The Bench comprising Chief Justice Manjula Chellur and Justice K.Vinod Chandran reserved the order after the conclusion of arguments on the appeals.

The single judge had held that the UGC regulations did not confer any right on the UGC to fix a high mark after holding of the NET.

Nor such criteria could be introduced through regulation just before the announcement of the results by executive orders.

The introduction of the new criteria was not supported by the law, the single judge had held.

As per the new criteria, candidates in the general category who had scored an aggregate of 65 per cent for all the three papers would be eligible to lectureship while the OBC candidates need 60 per cent and the marks for candidates in the SC/ST category was 55 per cent.

The single judge had also declared that the petitioners who had obtained separate minimum marks prescribed in the UGC notification had cleared the NET .The court had ordered that they should be given the necessary certificates in a month.

In its appeal, the UGC contended that the High Court had no right to make a declaration regarding the result of the test.

It had been clearly stated in the original notification that candidates should obtain the minimum required marks in each paper separately.

It had also been said that the qualifying criteria for Junior Research Fellowship and eligibility for lectureship would be decided by the UGC before the declaration of results.

It was the moderation committee appointed by the UGC comprising senior academicians who had recommended that the general, OBC (non-creamy layer) and the SC/ST candidates would be required to obtain an aggregate percentage of 65, 60 and 55 respectively in addition to the paper-wise minimum percentage as qualifying criteria.

The notification had clearly said that the final cut-off shall be decided by the commission before the declaration of results. The single judge’s ruling would only affect the standard of education.

Views: 1230

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

when will be order come at the glens 

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp