LIS Links Becoming More Social

Latest Activity

Kajal Kumari and Mukesh Kumar Prajapat are now friends
14 hours ago
Ravish Verma is attending Dr. ARJUN's event
18 hours ago
Dr. Badan Barman posted events
yesterday
Dr. Sangita Utekar updated their profile
yesterday
kanishk kumar yadav updated their profile
yesterday
Dr. Sangita Utekar posted a status
"What are you up to?"
yesterday
Profile IconDeepika Rajwade, Shashank Tripathi, Ajay and 4 more joined LIS Links
yesterday
Khadeeja Mohammed Nizam Ansari posted an event

AI-Powered Bibliometric Analysis:10-Day Hands-on Research-to-Publication Programme at Online

December 1, 2026 at 7:30pm to December 10, 2026 at 9pm
yesterday
Varada Vaman Jog posted an event
Thumbnail

Two-Day National Level Workshop on "Gateways to Global Visibility: Publishing in Scopus and WoS Journals" at Dnyanprassarak Mandal’s College and Research Centre

December 1, 2026 to December 2, 2026
yesterday
Shashank Tripathi shared Dr. ARJUN's event on Facebook
Sunday
Moti Prakash Singh updated their profile
Friday
Rahul sinha updated their profile
Friday

Order Reserved on UGC’s Plea on UGC June, 2012 NET Examination

http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/order-reserved-on-...

A Division Bench of the Kerala High Court on Monday reserved its order on an appeal filed by the UGC against a single judge’s verdict quashing the new qualifying criteria prescribed by the UGC in the National Eligibility Test for lectureships.

The Bench comprising Chief Justice Manjula Chellur and Justice K.Vinod Chandran reserved the order after the conclusion of arguments on the appeals.

The single judge had held that the UGC regulations did not confer any right on the UGC to fix a high mark after holding of the NET.

Nor such criteria could be introduced through regulation just before the announcement of the results by executive orders.

The introduction of the new criteria was not supported by the law, the single judge had held.

As per the new criteria, candidates in the general category who had scored an aggregate of 65 per cent for all the three papers would be eligible to lectureship while the OBC candidates need 60 per cent and the marks for candidates in the SC/ST category was 55 per cent.

The single judge had also declared that the petitioners who had obtained separate minimum marks prescribed in the UGC notification had cleared the NET .The court had ordered that they should be given the necessary certificates in a month.

In its appeal, the UGC contended that the High Court had no right to make a declaration regarding the result of the test.

It had been clearly stated in the original notification that candidates should obtain the minimum required marks in each paper separately.

It had also been said that the qualifying criteria for Junior Research Fellowship and eligibility for lectureship would be decided by the UGC before the declaration of results.

It was the moderation committee appointed by the UGC comprising senior academicians who had recommended that the general, OBC (non-creamy layer) and the SC/ST candidates would be required to obtain an aggregate percentage of 65, 60 and 55 respectively in addition to the paper-wise minimum percentage as qualifying criteria.

The notification had clearly said that the final cut-off shall be decided by the commission before the declaration of results. The single judge’s ruling would only affect the standard of education.

Views: 1249

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

when will be order come at the glens 

RSS

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp