Latest Activity

Sanjeev Kumar updated their profile
yesterday
S. Jaffer Basha left a comment for Pallavi Sushant Sapkal
yesterday
Syed Abdal Ahmad Khan updated their profile
Wednesday
ASHWINI KULKARNI and KUMAR RAJ are now friends
Monday
Salauddeen khan posted a blog post
Sunday
Anuj Kumar Singh posted a blog post
Sunday
Dr. Saurabh Prajapati updated their profile
Saturday
Nagender Singh updated their profile
Jul 10
Sunita Pareek posted an event
Jul 7
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN and Akshay Subhash Gadade are now friends
Jul 6
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
Jul 6
Dr.Akash Kumar Singh replied to Yogesh Awasthi's discussion Admission Notice from G. F. College, Shahjahanpur, U.P.
Jul 6
Akshay Subhash Gadade shared a profile on Facebook
Jul 4
Bidyut Bikash Kalita updated their profile
Jul 4
Dr. Sheel Bhadra Yadav posted a discussion
Jul 3
chinnadurai.D posted a discussion
Jul 3
Dr. Shivangkumar Bhaskarbhai Mah updated their profile
Jul 1
Dr. Shivangkumar Bhaskarbhai Mah and Dr. Badan Barman are now friends
Jul 1
Krishna kumar yadav shared a profile on Facebook
Jul 1
Krishna kumar yadav updated their profile
Jul 1

Order Reserved on UGC’s Plea on UGC June, 2012 NET Examination

http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/order-reserved-on-...

A Division Bench of the Kerala High Court on Monday reserved its order on an appeal filed by the UGC against a single judge’s verdict quashing the new qualifying criteria prescribed by the UGC in the National Eligibility Test for lectureships.

The Bench comprising Chief Justice Manjula Chellur and Justice K.Vinod Chandran reserved the order after the conclusion of arguments on the appeals.

The single judge had held that the UGC regulations did not confer any right on the UGC to fix a high mark after holding of the NET.

Nor such criteria could be introduced through regulation just before the announcement of the results by executive orders.

The introduction of the new criteria was not supported by the law, the single judge had held.

As per the new criteria, candidates in the general category who had scored an aggregate of 65 per cent for all the three papers would be eligible to lectureship while the OBC candidates need 60 per cent and the marks for candidates in the SC/ST category was 55 per cent.

The single judge had also declared that the petitioners who had obtained separate minimum marks prescribed in the UGC notification had cleared the NET .The court had ordered that they should be given the necessary certificates in a month.

In its appeal, the UGC contended that the High Court had no right to make a declaration regarding the result of the test.

It had been clearly stated in the original notification that candidates should obtain the minimum required marks in each paper separately.

It had also been said that the qualifying criteria for Junior Research Fellowship and eligibility for lectureship would be decided by the UGC before the declaration of results.

It was the moderation committee appointed by the UGC comprising senior academicians who had recommended that the general, OBC (non-creamy layer) and the SC/ST candidates would be required to obtain an aggregate percentage of 65, 60 and 55 respectively in addition to the paper-wise minimum percentage as qualifying criteria.

The notification had clearly said that the final cut-off shall be decided by the commission before the declaration of results. The single judge’s ruling would only affect the standard of education.

Views: 1243

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

when will be order come at the glens 

RSS

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp