Two day Workshop on Koha on 14-15 December 2024. at KLA Head Quarters, Room No. 36, II Floor, Kairalie Plaza Annexe, Karamana–Killippalam NH, Karamana PO, Thiruvananthapuram–695002. Kerala
December 14, 2024 to December 15, 2024
LIS Links
First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India
LIS Links Becoming More Social
Birthdays
Birthdays Today
Latest Activity
National Conference on "Reimagining of Libraries: The Future of Traditional and Modern Synergy".
January 4, 2025 from 10am to 5pmRULIC–2025: International Conference on 'Viksit Bharat 2047: The Role of Public Libraries in Preserving Indian Knowledge Systems and Integrating NEP 2020
January 3, 2025 at 6pm to January 5, 2025 at 7pmTwo day Workshop on Koha on 14-15 December 2024.
December 14, 2024 to December 15, 2024
Walk-in on 02/12/2024 (Monday) for engagement of B.L.I.Sc Graduate Apprentice @ National Institute of Ocean Technology (NIOT), Chennai-600 100. Tamilnadu.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: Recruitment Advertisement for Librarian Examination-2022 Dated: 30/12/2022-Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission (MPPSC), Indore, M.P.
Applications are invited from eligible candidates for the position of Library and Information Assistant (LIA) @ ICFRE-Institute of Wood Science and Technology (IWST), Bengaluru, Karnataka.
Opinion against minium marks for different category
I have a serious objection towards the cut off mark essential for the General category of students who write the UGC exam. To decide a candidate if he has passed or failed in the UGC exam the differentiation in the marks is not acceptable. The eligibility to write UGC has a differentiation in marks which I do not object. But to decide if I have passed or failed in UGC has been declared with different marks for different category, which is very undigestable.Kindly consider and make an equal assessment for all categories. This is my personal opinion which i consider is essential for the future development of our country's education system.
Views: 1553
Replies to This Forum
-
Permalink Reply by ATCHI MAHESH on
-
I too agreed with you Sir
-
Permalink Reply by Ashok Bhatt on
-
I also belongs to OBC Category.I Have 61% in NET Exam, But I Filled my Form in Gen Category...Why? I Dont want to Hurt any Community, But I am Totaly Disagree with UGC Criteria for Qualifying UGC/NET Exam at different lavels. This system is Totaly wrong. I Want to say Much More on This Topic but there is No Use to Reading a book to a Buffalo. I Just Want to say that in India There are so many programmes started to get a tallent, like (DID, Sa Re Ga Ma Pa, Indian Idol, Sur Kshetra, and so on , Why they can't take desicion category wise, why they are in search of a talented singer or dancer. “Biology gives you a brain. Life turns it into a mind.” " God Gives us same Mind ,No Mind is Poor by Birth nor different by Race , Religion, Sex or Age"The purpose of education is to replace an empty mind with an open one.
-
Permalink Reply by Sanjeev Dhurwey on
-
You are right Ashok, there is no use in blowing BANSUREE here.
-
-
Today's World's Greatest Personalities are on Peak Due to There Talent not due to their Religion, Race and Sex.
-
-
Yes, apart from eligibility (PG percentage) criteria for appearing the NET exam, WE ALSO DO NOT MIND THE DIFFERENCE OF FEES for prospectus and NET registration. But disparity in qualifying NET percentage, is really regrettable.
Just an anology: you give discounts for appearing 100 mts race, but general candidate has to run 100 mts and others less than 100 mts is really demotivating.
- ‹ Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next ›
© 2024 Created by Dr. Badan Barman.
Powered by
