Replies to This Forum

Permalink Reply by Apurba Jyoti Majumder on October 19, 2009 at 23:38

Negative marking is really necessary to minimise "NET by Chance."

It will find out the real talents.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by meera raikwar on March 21, 2010 at 18:15

negative marking is good.because student will not trying our luck ,the student who work hard .then he will get succes.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by kamlakar dhabale on March 22, 2010 at 2:14

negative marking system is useful for talented and hard working students, but marking pattern for different categories wise different passing pattern i want for all students that's remain same when real talent is find

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Abhijeet Ramesh Vitekar on May 18, 2010 at 22:31

I Agree with Kamlakar Dhabale

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mamta Verma on May 19, 2010 at 18:09

Hello Yusuf,

I personally think negative marking is a good attempt to promote the genuine canditates aspiring for NET. In my opinion negative marking won't affect the performance of candidates, because if the candidate is confident that he/she has attempted the enough questions for qualifying the paper, there is no need to attempt the questions he/she is not familiar with.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dr. Badan Barman on June 8, 2010 at 22:23

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Shrishail Kallappa Sarade on June 9, 2010 at 0:36

Nice question asks , Many students r more stress given for P-III, but P-I, P-II is more important b,case lot of students not passed in P-I,II so more then 60-70% students r not qualify 4 P-III so look at the results of Dec-2009 NET, The first paper is quite difficult & plus negative marking system is applied so lot of confusion ..
again UGC dec that Negive marking system is not apply for the next NET exam its good decision 4 students point of view

• ▶ Reply