Latest Activity

Shameer K K liked Shameer K K's discussion UGC JRF Holders' List with Marks (December 2013)
4 hours ago

Shameer K K shared their discussion on Facebook
4 hours ago

Shameer K K liked Satya Prakash Maurya's discussion UGC National Eligibility Test Result December 2013
4 hours ago

Subir Das replied to Abilash Achuthan's discussion UGC NET December 2013 Centre Wise Stats, Library and Information Science (Subject Code 59)
6 hours ago

Alka Mistry is now friends with N S Charan and Jorawar Singh Lamba
7 hours ago

Santosh Deshmukh replied to Roushan A. Y. Sarkar's discussion Updated Answer Keys of Paper-III of Dec 2012 UGC-NET after Redressal of Grievances
9 hours ago

Uttar Pradesh
SHIPRA SWARAJ is now friends with sunil kumar, Kailash Kumar, mohit dhama and M.Srinivas
10 hours ago
KRISHNA KUMAR MAURYA liked atar singh's discussion Librarian Vacancy in Uttar Pradesh Immediately
10 hours ago

anand medar is now friends with Soumya Rani H.S., Daksh patidar and Manjunath DK
10 hours ago

Satyajit Paul and jinti barua are now friends
10 hours ago

Ravi commented on Badan Barman's blog post Librarian, Assistant Librarian & Library Assistant at New Horizon Educational Institutions, Bangalore
10 hours ago

Govind Prasad Sharma replied to SUBHASISH KARAK's discussion Clarification needed on fine for delay in return of books
10 hours ago

Andhra Pradesh
sridhar updated their profile
10 hours ago

Ravi is now friends with Shivakumara S.U, Dr.Govardhan Pralhadrao Aute and Ramakant Jha
10 hours ago

Ravi updated their profile
10 hours ago

Uttar Pradesh
Akhilesh Sharma updated their profile
11 hours ago

Dear friends,

Kerala HC Court verdict comes  and its favour to candidates . The court  declared that the petitioners, who had obtained the separate minimum marks prescribed in the UGC notification, had cleared the NET. The court also ordered that they should be issued the necessary certificate in a month.

copy of the verdict available in :-

Tags: 2012, Court, High, June, Kerala, NET, Order:UGC, Unfair, case, cut

Views: 14841


Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

thanks sir, please upload the Right to Information in Right to Equality in Right Time. sir, please.

Now what is the minimum qualifying percentage june 2012 candidate

Now what is the minimum qualifying percentage june 2012 candidate


it is good news,my result show net jun-2012 (answer key wise) is 53.14% OBC candidate, can i pass this exam please tell me,

UGC NET : Changes illegal - Kerala HC

Mathrubhumi Education Online

Kochi, Dec 17, 2012 : The High Court of Kerala today declared illegal the modifications brought for the evaluation of UGC NET answer papers. The court observed that modifications made after pronouncement of the examination is totally against the spirit of law and should be considered as arbitrary. Justice T R Ramachandran Nair who heared a bunch of petitions of more than 7,000 candidates ordered that the petitioners should be treated as passed in the examination.

The NET is conducted by the University Grants Commission for Junior Research Fellowships and Lectureships. Candidates who clear NET in the latter category are eligibe for employment in any university in the country. On 24th of June 2012, the NET was conducted in a new avatar with the paper in MCQ format.

A notification issued before the June exam said candidates will have to score a minimum percentage in all three papers. For paper-1 and 2, the minimum was set at 40% for general category while the reserved category candidates were allowed a 5% relief. For paper 3, the minimum was set at 50% for general category, 45% for OBC and 40% for other reserved categories. All students were given a carbon copy of their answer sheets and when the answer keys were uploaded on the UGC site, the results were 'unofficially' declared.

But later just before the publication of the results on September 18, the UGC in their website put another notification, saying that candidates need an aggregate of 65% in all three papers (60% for OBC and 55% for others) to be eligible for lectureship. The main contention of the petitioners was against this unprecedented notification.

The counsel for UGC in his submission said that 5.75 lakhs students appeared in the test and as per the modified conditions 43,000 candidates qualified. last year this was 7,500, he said. He also submitted before the court that there is already a provision in the original notification giving powers for making necessary changes if required.

will verdict  applicable on all the affected candidates or only petitioners???????????

The hard copy of the court verdict get within a week of time.The confusion is now "its applicable to all" or " its applicable to the petitioners only". 
The newspaper/online sources are not reveal the truth and make confusion to the public. So pls wait for the original hard copy of the verdict  and if its for petitioners only then file a writ petition in your highcourt and pointing that  the same verdict applicable in your case also ..

thanks sir, for the reply


Is it possible for you to provide me the copy of the  Kerala high court verdict in ms-word(.doc )format.I have tried to take the print out from your shared link which is in share slide but print of all the pages is not possible there.My

Thanks & Regards


Please update news about june 12 results hc in kerala. we are waiting....................................................

Order’s benefit for all eligible candidates: court STAFF REPORTER SHARE · PRINT · T+ Quashing of new qualifying criteria prescribed by UGC after holding NET The benefit of a single Bench order quashing the new qualifying criteria prescribed by the University Grants Commission (UGC) after holding the National Eligibility Test (NET) for lectureships will be available to all eligible candidates, the Kerala High Court held on Tuesday. Justice T.R. Ramachandran Nair had earlier held that UGC regulations did not confer any right on the UGC to fix high marks after holding the NET. He also maintained that such criteria cannot be introduced just before the announcement of the results by executive orders. The introduction of the new criteria was not supported by law. In his order on Tuesday, Justice P.R. Ramachandra Menon said the apex court had earlier held that if a judgment was rather declaratory, it would be applicable to all irrespective of the fact that they were petitioners to the case or not. The verdict passed by the single judge was declaratory in nature, the court said disposing of a batch of petitions seeking to obtain the benefits of the judgment by the single judge. Justice T.R. Ramachandran Nair had observed that the students were jolted when the UGC all of a sudden prescribed the percentage of the aggregate marks.


© 2014   Created by Badan Barman.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...