Latest Activity

sukham romen singh left a comment for Khundrakpam Premoda Devi
6 hours ago
Prakhar Dixit updated their profile
yesterday
Mr. K. Kanipriyan and Kannan G are now friends
yesterday
Rohan Gupta updated their profile
yesterday
Profile IconN.KAPILESH, Bhamare Rhishikesh Suresh, piyush dhekale and 26 more joined LIS Links
yesterday
Madhu E S posted a blog post
yesterday
Shompa Das (Chaudhury) posted a blog post
yesterday
Shaheen Momin posted a discussion
yesterday
MD KAIYUM SHAIKH posted an event

International Conference on “Transforming Libraries through AI for a Smarter Knowledge Future” (ICTL–2026) at Kalinga University, Naya Raipur, Mode: Hybrid (Online & Offline)

June 19, 2026 at 9am to June 20, 2026 at 5pm
yesterday
Nagappa Veerappa Bakkannanavar posted an event
yesterday
Dr. SUDHI S VIJAYAN posted a discussion
yesterday
Oriental Library Association posted a discussion
yesterday
Dr. Chittaranjan Nayak posted a discussion
yesterday
Suresh Vyas posted a discussion
yesterday
Krishna kumar yadav is attending Dr. Sandip Pathak's event
Thumbnail

13th Convention Planner 2026 at Gauhati University,  Guwahati, Assam.

September 18, 2026 at 9am to September 20, 2026 at 7pm
yesterday
Anil Singh Yadav left a comment for Krishna kumar yadav
Saturday
Krishna kumar yadav left a comment for Anil Singh Yadav
May 20
Dr Rajiv Vij updated their profile
May 19
Mr. K. Kanipriyan is attending MD KAIYUM SHAIKH's event
May 19
Vikash Kumar Dwivedi updated their profile
May 13

Is There Any Grammatical Mistake in Dr. Ranganatha's Five Law of Library Science

Many Lecturer says that there are grammatical mistake in the 2nd & 3rd Law of Library Science..

Every Reader his/her Book

Every Book It's Reader

The above statement doesn't make any sense. Please guide me, Is this really so and How Dr. Ranganathan can do such mistake

Views: 820

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Dear Atul

If you or your lecturers feel there is a grammatical mistake in the above laws enunciated by Dr. SRR then what according to you or your lecturers should be the right version?

If we know that then we will be able to debate freely on the issue.

I feel the laws stated above are right.  Superfluous words have been eliminated and law of parsimony,I guess, has been applied.

Thanku so much for your Reply...

Lecturer says that

3rd & 4th law should be

Every Reader has his /her Book

Every book has its Reader.

I toldthem that it is law and law should be free of grammar and unwanted word

Dear sir,

Dr. Rangnathan is considered to be the father of library science, documentation, and information science in India. So we should understand that father can't make mistakes, instead children sometimes misinterpret the father.

One can say there are grammatical mistakes, If you write these laws without commas,

          2nd law:-   "Every reader his [or her] book."

          3rd law:-    "Every book its reader."

You may find it perfectly fine if they are written with commas;

          2nd law:-  "Every reader ,  his [or her] book."

          3rd law:-   "Every book ,  its reader."

There is no need to use any prepositions or verbs in this laws for grammatical corrections. It is worth to understand the meaning of these laws instead of criticizing Dr. Rangnathan.

Regards

RSS

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp