ICAL 2026: International Conference on Asian Libraries on Evolving Information Landscape: Making Libraries Future-Ready at IIM, Kashipur, Uttarakhand
April 16, 2026 at 9am to April 18, 2026 at 5pm
LIS Links
First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India
LIS Links Becoming More Social
Birthdays
Birthdays Today
Latest Activity
Direct Recruitment Notification for Librarian Posts at Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS) and Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti (NVS).
Wanted Assistant Librarian (Operations), Archivist @ Knowledge Resource Centre (KRC), Azim Premji Foundation, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow invites Online applications from interested and eligible candidates for filling up the Assistant Librarian, Library Attendant non-teaching positions
71st ILA Conference: Transforming Library Services in the AI Era: Library Services, User Engagement and Community Impact
February 5, 2026 at 9am to February 7, 2026 at 5pmTwo Days International Seminar On Man-Machine Collaborations for Library Practices
December 8, 2025 at 9am to December 9, 2025 at 5pmRESCOMM 2025: Research Communication Conclave
December 17, 2025 at 9am to December 19, 2025 at 6pm
RESCOMM 2025: Research Communication Conclave at Ashoka University
December 17, 2025 at 9am to December 19, 2025 at 6pm
International Conference at Hybrid Mode (Offline and Online)
December 12, 2025 at 9am to December 13, 2025 at 6pm
Is There Any Grammatical Mistake in Dr. Ranganatha's Five Law of Library Science
Many Lecturer says that there are grammatical mistake in the 2nd & 3rd Law of Library Science..
Every Reader his/her Book
Every Book It's Reader
The above statement doesn't make any sense. Please guide me, Is this really so and How Dr. Ranganathan can do such mistake
Views: 786
Replies to This Forum
-
Permalink Reply by Siddu on
-
Dear Atul
If you or your lecturers feel there is a grammatical mistake in the above laws enunciated by Dr. SRR then what according to you or your lecturers should be the right version?
If we know that then we will be able to debate freely on the issue.
I feel the laws stated above are right. Superfluous words have been eliminated and law of parsimony,I guess, has been applied.
-
Permalink Reply by Atul R. Sidurkar on
-
Thanku so much for your Reply...
Lecturer says that
3rd & 4th law should be
Every Reader has his /her Book
Every book has its Reader.
I toldthem that it is law and law should be free of grammar and unwanted word
-
Permalink Reply by Jignesh C. Parmar on
-
Dear sir,
Dr. Rangnathan is considered to be the father of library science, documentation, and information science in India. So we should understand that father can't make mistakes, instead children sometimes misinterpret the father.
One can say there are grammatical mistakes, If you write these laws without commas,
2nd law:- "Every reader his [or her] book."
3rd law:- "Every book its reader."
You may find it perfectly fine if they are written with commas;
2nd law:- "Every reader , his [or her] book."
3rd law:- "Every book , its reader."
There is no need to use any prepositions or verbs in this laws for grammatical corrections. It is worth to understand the meaning of these laws instead of criticizing Dr. Rangnathan.
Regards
© 2025 Created by Dr. Badan Barman.
Powered by
