LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

Yogesh Kawale updated their profile
Thursday
Peeyush Dwivedi posted a blog post
Thursday
Ravithimmegowda posted a discussion
Thursday
Ashok Singh updated their profile
Thursday
jai prakash kumar posted a status
"What are you up to?"
Wednesday
Abhisekh Chetry joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Wednesday
Abhisekh Chetry joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Wednesday
Sidhartha Batsya joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Monday
Sidhartha Batsya joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Monday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
Jun 27
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted an event

Gyanotsav-2025: National Conference on Re-imagining Libraries as Engines of Viksit Bharat at Gyan Mandir at the National Law Institute University, Bhopal.

August 29, 2025 at 9am to August 30, 2025 at 5pm
Jun 26
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted discussions
Jun 26
komal patel posted an event
Thumbnail

National Conference on Re-Imagining Libraries of Viksit Bharat 29-30 AUGUST 2025 at Bhopal

August 29, 2025 at 10am to August 30, 2025 at 5pm
Jun 26
komal patel updated their profile
Jun 26
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
Jun 25
Dr. O Seshaiaih posted a discussion
Jun 25
Jatin Baweja and Deepak Sharma are now friends
Jun 25
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a blog post
Jun 23
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
Jun 23
Profile IconJasvir kaur, Dr. Nilanjana Purkayastha, Aakib and 2 more joined LIS Links
Jun 22

Is There Any Grammatical Mistake in Dr. Ranganatha's Five Law of Library Science

Many Lecturer says that there are grammatical mistake in the 2nd & 3rd Law of Library Science..

Every Reader his/her Book

Every Book It's Reader

The above statement doesn't make any sense. Please guide me, Is this really so and How Dr. Ranganathan can do such mistake

Views: 756

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Dear Atul

If you or your lecturers feel there is a grammatical mistake in the above laws enunciated by Dr. SRR then what according to you or your lecturers should be the right version?

If we know that then we will be able to debate freely on the issue.

I feel the laws stated above are right.  Superfluous words have been eliminated and law of parsimony,I guess, has been applied.

Thanku so much for your Reply...

Lecturer says that

3rd & 4th law should be

Every Reader has his /her Book

Every book has its Reader.

I toldthem that it is law and law should be free of grammar and unwanted word

Dear sir,

Dr. Rangnathan is considered to be the father of library science, documentation, and information science in India. So we should understand that father can't make mistakes, instead children sometimes misinterpret the father.

One can say there are grammatical mistakes, If you write these laws without commas,

          2nd law:-   "Every reader his [or her] book."

          3rd law:-    "Every book its reader."

You may find it perfectly fine if they are written with commas;

          2nd law:-  "Every reader ,  his [or her] book."

          3rd law:-   "Every book ,  its reader."

There is no need to use any prepositions or verbs in this laws for grammatical corrections. It is worth to understand the meaning of these laws instead of criticizing Dr. Rangnathan.

Regards

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop