LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

LIS Links Becoming More Social

Latest Activity

Dr. Chiranjeevi L M updated their profile
1 hour ago
Dr. Bhopendra Kumar updated their profile
7 hours ago
SALAM BINOY SINGH is attending Dr. Sandip Pathak's event
Thumbnail

13th Convention Planner 2026 at Gauhati University,  Guwahati, Assam.

September 18, 2026 at 9am to September 20, 2026 at 7pm
18 hours ago
Paradip Sen Roy updated their profile
22 hours ago
vandana mittal replied to hem chandra's discussion Updating Shelf Location in Bulk in Egranthalaya 3.0
yesterday
vandana mittal updated their profile
yesterday
Akash Pathave updated their profile
yesterday
Sanjana Saini is now a member of LIS Links
yesterday
NAVEEN VIKRAM SINGH shared a profile on Facebook
Monday
Sanjeev Kalita updated their profile
Monday
pooja katoch updated their profile
Monday
vaishaliingale73 and VIJAYAKUMAR V are now friends
Sunday
Joydip Barman updated their profile
Sunday
Abiola Bawuah updated their profile
Sunday
hem chandra posted a discussion
Sunday
Dr. Gulshan Kumar Sachdeva posted a discussion
Sunday
Profile IconSiddhartha Mondal, Krishnadev Tukaram Habbu, Shams Khan and 7 more joined LIS Links
Sunday
Umasankar Mahata updated their profile
Saturday
BASANT KUMAR updated their profile
Saturday
BASANT KUMAR posted a status
"What are you up to?Libraries are an integral part of education, research, knowledge creation and academic development. Yet, across instituti"
Saturday

Is There Any Grammatical Mistake in Dr. Ranganatha's Five Law of Library Science

Many Lecturer says that there are grammatical mistake in the 2nd & 3rd Law of Library Science..

Every Reader his/her Book

Every Book It's Reader

The above statement doesn't make any sense. Please guide me, Is this really so and How Dr. Ranganathan can do such mistake

Views: 843

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Dear Atul

If you or your lecturers feel there is a grammatical mistake in the above laws enunciated by Dr. SRR then what according to you or your lecturers should be the right version?

If we know that then we will be able to debate freely on the issue.

I feel the laws stated above are right.  Superfluous words have been eliminated and law of parsimony,I guess, has been applied.

Thanku so much for your Reply...

Lecturer says that

3rd & 4th law should be

Every Reader has his /her Book

Every book has its Reader.

I toldthem that it is law and law should be free of grammar and unwanted word

Dear sir,

Dr. Rangnathan is considered to be the father of library science, documentation, and information science in India. So we should understand that father can't make mistakes, instead children sometimes misinterpret the father.

One can say there are grammatical mistakes, If you write these laws without commas,

          2nd law:-   "Every reader his [or her] book."

          3rd law:-    "Every book its reader."

You may find it perfectly fine if they are written with commas;

          2nd law:-  "Every reader ,  his [or her] book."

          3rd law:-   "Every book ,  its reader."

There is no need to use any prepositions or verbs in this laws for grammatical corrections. It is worth to understand the meaning of these laws instead of criticizing Dr. Rangnathan.

Regards

RSS

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp