LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

NAVEEN VIKRAM SINGH shared a profile on Facebook
48 minutes ago
Sanjeev Kalita updated their profile
1 hour ago
pooja katoch updated their profile
2 hours ago
Paradip sen roy updated their profile
14 hours ago
vaishaliingale73 and VIJAYAKUMAR V are now friends
14 hours ago
Joydip Barman updated their profile
19 hours ago
Abiola Bawuah updated their profile
19 hours ago
hem chandra posted a discussion
22 hours ago
Dr. Gulshan Kumar Sachdeva posted a discussion
22 hours ago
Profile IconSiddhartha Mondal, Krishnadev Tukaram Habbu, Shams Khan and 7 more joined LIS Links
22 hours ago
Umasankar Mahata updated their profile
yesterday
BASANT KUMAR updated their profile
Saturday
BASANT KUMAR posted a status
"What are you up to?Libraries are an integral part of education, research, knowledge creation and academic development. Yet, across instituti"
Saturday
BASANT KUMAR posted a status
"What arParity in the Indian Workforce: A Question Worth Discussing Across India, differences in pay scales, designations, responsibilitie"
Saturday
Dr. O Seshaiaih and Arun kumar Sirla are now friends
Thursday
Dr. Vijayakumar M and VISHNU K. GUPTA are now friends
Thursday
PRAKASH posted a status
"I applied for a Bihar Library job, so I need some study material. Please help me out"
Wednesday
Rikki Singh Cintury joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Wednesday
CHIPPA ANJANEYULU updated their profile
Tuesday
allauddin updated their profile
Tuesday

I would like to know that whether different editions of same title should be treat as different titles or not. For

example if we have 3rd , 4th and 5th edition of Data communication by forouzan then can we count it

3 titles or not?.

Views: 545

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Yes, it is 3 titles.

They will be treated as same title

They are treated as same titles.  But, I am at times amused why it is so? When we say it is same title then - author should be same, title should be same and more importantly the thought content of the material should be same.  when there is a different edition of the book, obviously there shall be addition or deletion of thought over the previous edition (different thought content).  Therefore the book (material) should be treated as a different title.  This is what I honestly feel

and what about if the next edition has a slight change in title then also we  take it as same title ??

Actually we can also take it as different title ? actually it s up to you how to treat various matters in library because there is no where written about such treatments of books.

The matter cannot be left to the whims and fancies of the librarian.  There should be uniformity and standardization of procedures.
Considering a material as a new title purely on the basis of the difference in ISBN alone is incorrect. 
Supposing I have a book in print format.  It has got some ISBN.  Tomorrow if the same is publised in an e-book format, then  it will be assigned different ISBN Number though the thought content remains the same. ISBN also changes when the copy rights of the same title are transferred to some other publiser and the same book emerges as a product of different publiser.  Therefore the only logical reasoning to be applied while considering a book as a different title is the difference in thought content.
I therefore agree that different editions of the same title have to be treated as different titles.

As we know ISBN number is unique for a book but if ISBN number change in different edition of same books published by same publisher then is should be treat as different title

that is what i am trying to say the logical reasoning behind the matter and that depends on the intellect of librarian. There is no written conduct that could guide librarians so that standardization could be maintained . 

RSS

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp