Latest Activity

Preeti Sharda updated their profile
5 hours ago
1994 updated their profile
7 hours ago
1994 and Dr. Badan Barman are now friends
7 hours ago
vijayakumar.m updated their profile
7 hours ago
VINOD D updated their profile
8 hours ago
ASIF ALI updated their profile
9 hours ago
Manjunath Dodamani updated their profile
10 hours ago
CHANDRAN VELMURUGAN is now friends with Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN and BMS PUBLISHING HOUSE
11 hours ago
Shweta Vijendra Pathak posted an event
Thumbnail

📚 National Level Online Workshop – Librarian's Day Celebration 2026 at Online (Zoom Platform)

August 12, 2026 from 10:30am to 1pm
11 hours ago
SAVITHA S updated their profile
12 hours ago
KODELA SAI BABU updated their profile
12 hours ago
Dr. Ashwini Latte updated their profile
13 hours ago
Lili Sahu updated their profile
14 hours ago
Sugirthan Karthikeyan updated their profile
14 hours ago
Gurunathan Nagarajan updated their profile
14 hours ago
Shivakrishna S D updated their profile
14 hours ago
Pramod Kumar updated their profile
14 hours ago
Prashant Kumar Singh updated their profile
15 hours ago
Sanjay Nayak updated their profile
16 hours ago
RUSHIKESH HODSHIL updated their profile
16 hours ago

What are authors’ attitudes to open access publishing in 2014?

With open access continuing to have a high profile, is all the debate and discussion helping to inform researchers and influence their thinking?

The results of the 2014 Taylor & Francis Open Access Survey have been released for the first time today at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/openaccess/opensurvey/2014

The survey asked researchers a series of questions on their perceptions of open access; their attitudes, values and understanding of it; and what they believe the future of research communication to be. Having previously surveyed their authors in 2013, the results offer some intriguing shifts in opinions, placing responses from both years next to each another to show how views have changed, and to what degree. Responses show that positivity towards open access, when discussed in general, is growing.

There were significant increases in the proportions strongly agreeing that open access offered a wider circulation than publication in a subscription journal (from 38% to 49%), and that it offered higher visibility (27% to 35%). 70% of respondents also disagreed or strongly disagreed with the statement ‘There are no fundamental benefits to open access publication’, an increase of 10% year-on-year and a strong indicator that open access continues to be viewed as a force for good. Licences continue to be a contentious issue, with 53% of authors showing a first or second preference for the CC-BY-NC-ND licence. Despite strong advocates for CC-BY, it remained the ‘least preferred’ option in this survey. However, there is evidence that opinions on this are softening as understanding increases, with this proportion dropping from 52% in 2013 to 35% this year.

The full survey results and top level report is now available on Taylor & Francis Online at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/openaccess/opensurvey/2014

Findings on open access mandates will be published soon. Tell us what you think via Twitter @TandFOpen and follow the conversation at #oasurvey2014.


Best wishes,

Shafina Segon Head of Marketing Journals & Online Resources Shafina.segon@tandfindia.com
 

Views: 436

Reply to This

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp