Latest Activity

Boyet V Essave replied to Abilash Achuthan's discussion Kerala PSC Previous Question Papers and Answer Key - LIS
8 hours ago
Hemant Kumar updated their profile
10 hours ago
Hemant Kumar and Dr. Badan Barman are now friends
10 hours ago
Dr. Anjaneya Naik shared a profile on Facebook
15 hours ago
Dr. Anjaneya Naik updated their profile
16 hours ago
THAKKAR VIVEK RAJESHKUMAR might attend Nagappa Veerappa Bakkannanavar's event
Friday
Dr.Nishant Kumar Pandey updated their profile
Friday
Richa Bismiter shared Chinmayee Bhange's event on Facebook
Friday
Dr. Badan Barman is now friends with NILARANJAN BARIK, BMS PUBLISHING HOUSE, Mahadev Ghosh and Abhishek Singh
Thursday
Ananya Sarkar updated their profile
Thursday
Dr. Prabhat Ranjan and Dr. Pramod kumar are now friends
Thursday
Dr. Rupali M. Phule updated their profile
Thursday
M S M Shiham updated their profile
Wednesday
Sumedha Singh posted an event
Wednesday
Chinmayee Bhange posted events
Wednesday
Sumedha Singh posted a discussion
Wednesday
Shravan Kumar Suppala updated their profile
Wednesday
Dr. Vikram Kr. Sharma updated their profile
Wednesday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
Wednesday
Bonala Kondal updated their profile
Wednesday

What are authors’ attitudes to open access publishing in 2014?

With open access continuing to have a high profile, is all the debate and discussion helping to inform researchers and influence their thinking?

The results of the 2014 Taylor & Francis Open Access Survey have been released for the first time today at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/openaccess/opensurvey/2014

The survey asked researchers a series of questions on their perceptions of open access; their attitudes, values and understanding of it; and what they believe the future of research communication to be. Having previously surveyed their authors in 2013, the results offer some intriguing shifts in opinions, placing responses from both years next to each another to show how views have changed, and to what degree. Responses show that positivity towards open access, when discussed in general, is growing.

There were significant increases in the proportions strongly agreeing that open access offered a wider circulation than publication in a subscription journal (from 38% to 49%), and that it offered higher visibility (27% to 35%). 70% of respondents also disagreed or strongly disagreed with the statement ‘There are no fundamental benefits to open access publication’, an increase of 10% year-on-year and a strong indicator that open access continues to be viewed as a force for good. Licences continue to be a contentious issue, with 53% of authors showing a first or second preference for the CC-BY-NC-ND licence. Despite strong advocates for CC-BY, it remained the ‘least preferred’ option in this survey. However, there is evidence that opinions on this are softening as understanding increases, with this proportion dropping from 52% in 2013 to 35% this year.

The full survey results and top level report is now available on Taylor & Francis Online at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/openaccess/opensurvey/2014

Findings on open access mandates will be published soon. Tell us what you think via Twitter @TandFOpen and follow the conversation at #oasurvey2014.


Best wishes,

Shafina Segon Head of Marketing Journals & Online Resources Shafina.segon@tandfindia.com
 

Views: 436

Reply to This

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp